Mizzougrad96 said:I've been at papers that printed despite getting twice as much snow as this. As I said on the other thread, this would never happen 5-10 years ago.
TigerVols said:Mizzougrad96 said:I've been at papers that printed despite getting twice as much snow as this. As I said on the other thread, this would never happen 5-10 years ago.
Exactly.
Unbelievable.
OnTheRiver said:In 1936, our newspaper found a way to print when most of the city was under 10 feet of water.
In 2004, we did it with 6-foot snow drifts in some places.
Run the presses, boys.
slappy4428 said:OnTheRiver said:In 1936, our newspaper found a way to print when most of the city was under 10 feet of water.
In 2004, we did it with 6-foot snow drifts in some places.
Run the presses, boys.
It's not the printing, it's the distribution. And with papers bleeding, they are looking for excuses to cut corners.
RickStain said:The macho "we get the paper out no matter what" ethic can suck my ass until the newspaper agrees to pay for any damage my car accrues going to and from work.
Clerk Typist said:At the least, the World should follow the example of the New Orleans Times-Picayune during Katrina: The August 30, August 31, and September 1, 2005 editions were not printed, but available online PDFs. JRoyal, is that what you mean by an electronic edition?
Hell, then you can go back and print copies to deliver on Thursday, plus for souvenir hunters.