Baseball 2008 Thread 1

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

Status
Not open for further replies.
Worked OK for them last year, except the Dempster part. But I'm guessing Marshall or Hart will be in there by the time summer rolls around.
 
spnited said:
The Good Doctor said:
hockeybeat said:
The Good Doctor said:
Roberts and Crisp to the Cubs for prospects? I'll take it.
Would be a great deal for the Cubs.

Doc, what does the Cubs rotation look like after Zambrano?

1. Zambrano
2. Lilly
3. Dempster (they don't want consecutive lefties)
4. Hill
5. Probably Lieber. Possibly Marquis or Marshall.

That rotation sucks.

Say that when Pedro ends up on the DL in July, and El Duque is sucking wind in August, O Fossilized One.
 
Ted "carrer year (13-8. 3.83, yeah that's great) in '07, now I'll go back to sucking" Lilly. Ryan ****ing Dumpster?
And oh that No. 5 if maybe, we'll see. Can one of you pieces of **** actually pitch?
 
Good comeback. I see you failed to refute my post, because you know it's true. Have fun watching Mota in 60 games this year, too.
 
The Good Doctor said:
Good comeback. I see you failed to refute my post, because you know it's true. Have fun watching Mota in 60 games this year, too.

Does Spnited get the Brewers' games from his perch in Dirty Jersey?
 
****. I forgot about that. That's even better news for the Cubs. I still stand by my point that the Mets have a potentially disastrous bullpen.
 
Considering Guillermo Mota was traded to Milwaukee in November, I know you really have no ****ing clue what you're talking about.

Typical Cubs fansboilooser
 
The Good Doctor said:
****. I forgot about that. That's even better news for the Cubs. I still stand by my point that the Mets have a potentially disastrous bullpen.

And I'll stand by my point that you have no ****ing clue... like every other Cubs fanboilooser.
 
spnited said:
The Good Doctor said:
hockeybeat said:
The Good Doctor said:
Roberts and Crisp to the Cubs for prospects? I'll take it.
Would be a great deal for the Cubs.

Doc, what does the Cubs rotation look like after Zambrano?

1. Zambrano
2. Lilly
3. Dempster (they don't want consecutive lefties)
4. Hill
5. Probably Lieber. Possibly Marquis or Marshall.

That rotation sucks.

The Cubs have Lieber again?
That's a good signing. I like that rotation except for the 3 and 4 spots, though Hill could be OK.
Hell, he pitched in Boise when I lived up there, so I automatically root for him.
 
The Good Doctor said:
****. I forgot about that. That's even better news for the Cubs. I still stand by my point that the Mets have a potentially disastrous bullpen.

It's OK. Most of us would rather forget about Mota.
 
Speaking of ****, I was looking at the Giants roster the other day, and I don't know if they can win 50 games.
 
What possibly could have convinced Milwaukee it was a good idea to acquire Mota and Kendall? Do their agents have pictures of Doug Melvin fellating Bernie Brewer?
 
As the 2005 Dodgers fell apart, Paul Lo Duca was the main player who LA-area scribes cited as "dude who should not have been traded, so fire DePodesta!!!"

The other traded player whose name was invoked constantly, as Eric Gagne got tired after having to do more two-inning saves after midseason in 2004?

Guillermo Mota.
 
gagne's a ***** and should have been able to handle the two-inning save. that said, it's hard for me to hate on the brewers because the yankees signed latroy hawkins.
 
The Good Doctor said:
hockeybeat said:
The Good Doctor said:
Roberts and Crisp to the Cubs for prospects? I'll take it.
Would be a great deal for the Cubs.

Doc, what does the Cubs rotation look like after Zambrano?

1. Zambrano
2. Lilly
3. Dempster (they don't want consecutive lefties)
4. Hill
5. Probably Lieber. Possibly Marquis or Marshall.

Dempster won't be the 3. Lieber will. Marquis will be somewhere else by opening day.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top