slappy4428
Active Member
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2004
- Messages
- 38,815
Woot takes a swing at AP for stealing its blog copy for a story on getting sold to Amazon after AP announces it wants to charge bloggers for using its copy.
http://www.woot.com/blog/viewentry.aspx?id=13420
The AP, we can’t thank you enough for looking our way. You see, when we showed off our good news on Wednesday afternoon, we expected we’d get a little bit of attention. But when we found your little newsy thing you do, we couldn’t help but notice something important. And that something is this: you printed our web content in your article! The web content that came from our blog! Why, isn’t that the very thing you’ve previously told nu-media bloggers they’re not supposed to do?
Oh, and woot bosses? If you read this? I'm, not paying. I still have two sets of Woot-off lights that suck.
http://www.woot.com/blog/viewentry.aspx?id=13420
The AP, we can’t thank you enough for looking our way. You see, when we showed off our good news on Wednesday afternoon, we expected we’d get a little bit of attention. But when we found your little newsy thing you do, we couldn’t help but notice something important. And that something is this: you printed our web content in your article! The web content that came from our blog! Why, isn’t that the very thing you’ve previously told nu-media bloggers they’re not supposed to do?
Oh, and woot bosses? If you read this? I'm, not paying. I still have two sets of Woot-off lights that suck.