He's part of the AI that SJ.com is developing before it goes public.Are you a bot? You seem like a bot.
The transcription helps me jump through an interview on deadline. You can click or tap on a word in a conversation and pick up the audio from there, and if it needs cleaned up, it's easier to do that in small chunks than scrubbing through the entire interview.I've yet to have a good experience with Otter. It does not come close to 100% accuracy, so you're either wasting time cleaning **** up on deadline, or wasting time cleaning **** up on a longer transcript. Better to just listen to the recording and grab what you need on deadline or grin and bear it and transcribe a longer recording so that you don't have to waste time on the back end re-listening and cleaning up the mistakes.
You mean like Drip seemed to be like Boots?Are you a bot? You seem like a bot.
The transcription helps me jump through an interview on deadline. You can click or tap on a word in a conversation and pick up the audio from there, and if it needs cleaned up, it's easier to do that in small chunks than scrubbing through the entire interview.
It's not perfect, but it's solid as long as the audio quality is half decent.
Rev.com —fast, ~90% accurate (even for the tech stuff), and $0.25/minute.
I put it to you that you have disobeyed the prime directive. You are harmful to the body.That sounds like a great tool! I haven't used otter.ai myself, but the idea of automating transcription seems like a real time-saver, especially for interviews, meetings, and press conferences. The fact that it can work with Zoom and YouTube recordings is particularly useful, as it removes the need for manual transcription.
I imagine it would be a big help if you're dealing with a lot of audio or video content, and it could really streamline the reporting process. I'd love to hear more about how it works once you get a chance to test it out. If it lives up to the hype, it could be a game changer for many people in content creation, journalism, and even business.
Stay on topic and have a happy Otter day.You mean like Drip seemed to be like Boots?
I found TurboScribe after I started covering school board and city council meetings. It also isn't perfect, but close enough that I can usually rely on it (mistakes are usually quite obvious). I always try to give at least one extra listen to the audio just in case, because I struggle to fully trust any AI at this point.I switched about a year ago to TurboScribe and have never looked back. It is much better and more accurate -- it even comes with three different "speeds" of transcription that range from normal to super precise.