Guy_Incognito
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2004
- Messages
- 15,750
Evil ******* (aka Chris_L) said:The Yankees bullpen was a weak spot for the team last year (and probably next as well)
Was it? I thought they were pretty good, better than most.
Evil ******* (aka Chris_L) said:The Yankees bullpen was a weak spot for the team last year (and probably next as well)
Evil ******* (aka Chris_L) said:Using 2008 numbers:
Sabathia 17-10 / 35 GS / 253 IP / 76 ER / 2.70 ERA
Burnett 18-10 / 35 GS / 221 IP / 100 ER / 4.07 ERA
Combined 35-20 / 70 GS / 474 IP / 3.34 ERA / 6.77 IP/GS
Mussina 20-9 / 34 GS / 200 IP / 75 ER / 3.37 ERA
Pettitte 14-14 / 33 GS / 204 IP / 103 ER / 4.54 ERA
Combined 34-23 / 67 GS / 404 IP / 3.97 ERA / 6 IP/GS
The incoming tandem had 1 more win and 3 fewer losses (and yes I know how subjective wins and losses are). Even if you added 4 additional wins to the Yankees in 2008 - they still would have finished in 3rd place.
Probably most significant among the above stats is the fact that the new combo pitched about 1 more inning per start than the old combo. The Yankees bullpen was a weak spot for the team last year (and probably next as well) so going deeper into a start is a big plus. The caveat that has to be noted is that both CC Sabathia and AJ Burnett had their career bests in innings pitched last year. Asking them to match those numbers may be asking too much. It is very likely that the extra inning per start will evaporate and the production levels will be along the lines of what Mussina and Pettitte contributed.
An independent measurement of a player's contributions is Bill James' Win Share Method (where 4 win shares = one team win). Here's how the 4 players did in 2008:
Sabathia 25 WS
Mussina 18 WS
Burnett 14 WS
Pettitte 11 WS
Based upon those numbers the incoming duo had 10 more win shares which translates to 2.5 more wins.
Marginally better.
Flying Headbutt said:I think some could argue the incoming pitching tandem is only marginally better because of AJ Burnett. The guy is realllly streaky and inconsistent. One day he'll throw a complete game two-hitter, and then the next three he'll have trouble going 5 1/3 and giving up less than 5 runs. Someone I know called him the next Carl Pavano. That may be closer than some Yankees fans realize.
outofplace said:Yes, a comparison of pitchers that ignores ERA and only looks at victories, one that has pretty much been dismantled by multiple posters. More comedy. I love it.
Bottom line once again for those who keep trying to distract us: The Yankees now have the four highest salaries in baseball, including the best pitcher and the best hitter in this year's free agent market.
The four biggest free agent contracts so far were all given out by New York teams.
How about those for facts?
spnited said:outofplace said:Yes, a comparison of pitchers that ignores ERA and only looks at victories, one that has pretty much been dismantled by multiple posters. More comedy. I love it.
Bottom line once again for those who keep trying to distract us: The Yankees now have the four highest salaries in baseball, including the best pitcher and the best hitter in this year's free agent market.
The four biggest free agent contracts so far were all given out by New York teams.
How about those for facts?
And the Yankees still have question marks at second base, left field and catcher, and a gaping hole in center. The bullpen, other than Rivera, is also a little shaky.
And, obviously, the Yanks are replacing 40 year old Mussina and 36 year old Pettitte with 28 year old Sabbathia and 32 year old Burnettoutofplace said:Sabathia and Burnett are only marginally better than Mussina and Pettitte? Not sure I agree there, but I guess that depends on how you define "marginally."
Getting Wang back after he started only 15 games in '08 should also make an impact.
One way to look at it:Evil ******* (aka Chris_L) said:bigpern23 said:You note that it may be too much to ask for Sabathia and Burnett to match their inning totals of a year ago, yet you make no mention of how difficult it would be for Mussina to match his performance of a year ago.
Mussina won no more than 15 games in the four seasons preceding last year's 20-win campaign and he had a 4.36 ERA in that span. It seems a safe bet that he would have come back to that type of level, thus making the additions of Sabathia and Burnett more significant.
EXACTLY. Sabathia would have to match Mussina's career best of 20 wins to even match what is being lost by the Yankees. Sabathia is Mussina with a gut and Teixeira is Giambi with a glove as far as the signings are concerned. The Yankees never won a World Series with Giambi and Mussina in their primes but tell me again why the Yankees should be looking to print playoff tickets?
Can someone answer my original question?
Thanks
Looking at Jeter's numbers, he actually didn't have a bad season. he hit .300 for the 10th time in 13 years. His slg% took a dive, he didn;t hit doubles last season. but .363 OBP for a number 2 hitter is pretty good.Evil ******* (aka Chris_L) said:Sabathia and Burnett had their career highs in IP last season. It is too much to ask for them to match those numbers from last year. Sabathia may have the early season problems he had last season after being a workhorse in 2007. If he or Burnett gets off to a slow start then the pressure of playing for the Yankees could cause a snowball effect. Very few pitchers have been able to come into New York and be successful in their first season (Clemens was 14-10 his first year).
The glass is half full optimism of "Cano and Jeter are bound to have better years" shows that you are not looking at the realities of the situation. Jeter and Cano are not bound to have better years at all.
OTOH, the Orioles couldn't finish the International League in the moneyAngola! said:hey chris, if we are taking a glass half empty approach, then the red sox will be decidely worse this year, right? lowell and ortiz are older and coming off major injuries. matsuzaka, pedroia and youkilis will all drop off and their weak bullpen will continue to hurt them. so, apparently both the yankees and red sox will be worse. guess we should just hand the division to the rays.
Evil ******* (aka Chris_L) said:Using 2008 numbers:
Sabathia 17-10 / 35 GS / 253 IP / 76 ER / 2.70 ERA
Burnett 18-10 / 35 GS / 221 IP / 100 ER / 4.07 ERA
Combined 35-20 / 70 GS / 474 IP / 3.34 ERA / 6.77 IP/GS
Mussina 20-9 / 34 GS / 200 IP / 75 ER / 3.37 ERA
Pettitte 14-14 / 33 GS / 204 IP / 103 ER / 4.54 ERA
Combined 34-23 / 67 GS / 404 IP / 3.97 ERA / 6 IP/GS
The incoming tandem had 1 more win and 3 fewer losses (and yes I know how subjective wins and losses are). Even if you added 4 additional wins to the Yankees in 2008 - they still would have finished in 3rd place.
Probably most significant among the above stats is the fact that the new combo pitched about 1 more inning per start than the old combo. The Yankees bullpen was a weak spot for the team last year (and probably next as well) so going deeper into a start is a big plus. The caveat that has to be noted is that both CC Sabathia and AJ Burnett had their career bests in innings pitched last year. Asking them to match those numbers may be asking too much. It is very likely that the extra inning per start will evaporate and the production levels will be along the lines of what Mussina and Pettitte contributed.
An independent measurement of a player's contributions is Bill James' Win Share Method (where 4 win shares = one team win). Here's how the 4 players did in 2008:
Sabathia 25 WS
Mussina 18 WS
Burnett 14 WS
Pettitte 11 WS
Based upon those numbers the incoming duo had 10 more win shares which translates to 2.5 more wins.
Marginally better.
2muchcoffeeman said:Evil ******* (aka Chris_L) said:Using 2008 numbers:
Sabathia 17-10 / 35 GS / 253 IP / 76 ER / 2.70 ERA
Burnett 18-10 / 35 GS / 221 IP / 100 ER / 4.07 ERA
Combined 35-20 / 70 GS / 474 IP / 3.34 ERA / 6.77 IP/GS
Mussina 20-9 / 34 GS / 200 IP / 75 ER / 3.37 ERA
Pettitte 14-14 / 33 GS / 204 IP / 103 ER / 4.54 ERA
Combined 34-23 / 67 GS / 404 IP / 3.97 ERA / 6 IP/GS
The incoming tandem had 1 more win and 3 fewer losses (and yes I know how subjective wins and losses are). Even if you added 4 additional wins to the Yankees in 2008 - they still would have finished in 3rd place.
Probably most significant among the above stats is the fact that the new combo pitched about 1 more inning per start than the old combo. The Yankees bullpen was a weak spot for the team last year (and probably next as well) so going deeper into a start is a big plus. The caveat that has to be noted is that both CC Sabathia and AJ Burnett had their career bests in innings pitched last year. Asking them to match those numbers may be asking too much. It is very likely that the extra inning per start will evaporate and the production levels will be along the lines of what Mussina and Pettitte contributed.
An independent measurement of a player's contributions is Bill James' Win Share Method (where 4 win shares = one team win). Here's how the 4 players did in 2008:
Sabathia 25 WS
Mussina 18 WS
Burnett 14 WS
Pettitte 11 WS
Based upon those numbers the incoming duo had 10 more win shares which translates to 2.5 more wins.
Marginally better.
Down in St. Petersburg, the Rays have moved out Edwin Jackson (he was the weakest link -- good-bye!) to make room for David Price, a much better pitcher and there's more solid young pitching -- Jeff Niemann and Mitch Talbot, most notably -- coming up (along with Price) from last year's Durham Bulls.
I am not convinced that moving Chamberlain into the rotation is a good move for the Yankees or Chamberlain. The Yankees should be looking at Joba as their post-Rivera closer (Rivera is 39), but they're not.
2muchcoffeeman said:Evil ******* (aka Chris_L) said:Using 2008 numbers:
Sabathia 17-10 / 35 GS / 253 IP / 76 ER / 2.70 ERA
Burnett 18-10 / 35 GS / 221 IP / 100 ER / 4.07 ERA
Combined 35-20 / 70 GS / 474 IP / 3.34 ERA / 6.77 IP/GS
Mussina 20-9 / 34 GS / 200 IP / 75 ER / 3.37 ERA
Pettitte 14-14 / 33 GS / 204 IP / 103 ER / 4.54 ERA
Combined 34-23 / 67 GS / 404 IP / 3.97 ERA / 6 IP/GS
The incoming tandem had 1 more win and 3 fewer losses (and yes I know how subjective wins and losses are). Even if you added 4 additional wins to the Yankees in 2008 - they still would have finished in 3rd place.
Probably most significant among the above stats is the fact that the new combo pitched about 1 more inning per start than the old combo. The Yankees bullpen was a weak spot for the team last year (and probably next as well) so going deeper into a start is a big plus. The caveat that has to be noted is that both CC Sabathia and AJ Burnett had their career bests in innings pitched last year. Asking them to match those numbers may be asking too much. It is very likely that the extra inning per start will evaporate and the production levels will be along the lines of what Mussina and Pettitte contributed.
An independent measurement of a player's contributions is Bill James' Win Share Method (where 4 win shares = one team win). Here's how the 4 players did in 2008:
Sabathia 25 WS
Mussina 18 WS
Burnett 14 WS
Pettitte 11 WS
Based upon those numbers the incoming duo had 10 more win shares which translates to 2.5 more wins.
Marginally better.
Down in St. Petersburg, the Rays have moved out Edwin Jackson (he was the weakest link -- good-bye!) to make room for David Price, a much better pitcher and there's more solid young pitching -- Jeff Niemann and Mitch Talbot, most notably -- coming up (along with Price) from last year's Durham Bulls.
I am not convinced that moving Chamberlain into the rotation is a good move for the Yankees or Chamberlain. The Yankees should be looking at Joba as their post-Rivera closer (Rivera is 39), but they're not.