American flight lands at LAX with blown tire

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

old_tony

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 11, 2006
Messages
22,728
It was a front tire, and it shredded a bit leaving busted-up rubber on the runway while emergency vehicles followed it, but the landing seemed to go perfectly.

[blue] No word yet on whether spinning27 is blaming the blown tire on any of Sarah Palin's kids.[/blue]
 
old_tony said:
It was a front tire, and it shredded a bit leaving busted-up rubber on the runway while emergency vehicles followed it, but the landing seemed to go perfectly.

[blue] No word yet on whether spinning27 is blaming the blown tire on any of Sarah Palin's kids.[/blue]

You're silly.
 
old_tony said:
It was a front tire, and it shredded a bit leaving busted-up rubber on the runway while emergency vehicles followed it, but the landing seemed to go perfectly.

[blue] No word yet on whether spinning27 is blaming the blown tire on any of Sarah Palin's kids.[/blue]
An utter non-event.

Think the GOP convention on 11 tires.
 
That's an amazing job by the pilot to keep everything together and bring it down safely.
 
old_tony said:
It was a front tire, and it shredded a bit leaving busted-up rubber on the runway while emergency vehicles followed it, but the landing seemed to go perfectly.

[blue] No word yet on whether spinning27 is blaming the blown tire on any of Sarah Palin's kids.[/blue]

No word yet on whether you are spinning27's red twin.

Oh, wait, yes there is.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
CNN covered this like it was Air Force One being chased by Russian missiles....including a camera on the wrong plane, which landed flawlessly. The damaged plane also landed without incident, leaving the CNN talkers sounding as deflated as the bad tire.

Had to be scary for the folks on board, though. Circled for three hours to burn up fuel before landing back where they started.
 
21 said:
CNN covered this like it was Air Force One being chased by Russian missiles....including a camera on the wrong plane, which landed flawlessly. The damaged plane also landed without incident, leaving the CNN talkers sounding as deflated as the bad tire.

Had to be scary for the folks on board, though. Circled for three hours to burn up fuel before landing back where they started.

Yeah, I'd like to think I could get on another plane straight away, but that's got to be terrifying.
 
If it was a JetBlue plane they could have watched their fate on CNN like that one plane a few years ago that wound up landing safely.
 
21 said:
CNN covered this like it was Air Force One being chased by Russian missiles....including a camera on the wrong plane, which landed flawlessly. The damaged plane also landed without incident, leaving the CNN talkers sounding as deflated as the bad tire.

Had to be scary for the folks on board, though. Circled for three hours to burn up fuel before landing back where they started.

Fox News (not my choice...someone got to the tv at the gym before I did) did, too ... one of the reporters was tracking the plane on Flight Aware and kept talking about it. They must be loving the free advertising...
 
That was a Toronto bound fllight.

Probably a whole bunch of Hollywood folks heading to the Toronto Intl Film Festival which starts Thursday
 
I still don't understand why, if the plane has to be flown around for three hours to burn off fuel anyway, they can't fly those three hours in the direction of Toronto. If you know the tire's blown, it's not going to be any more blown when you get to Toronto.
 
FOX News folks were saying that LAX is one of two US airports that you'd want to make that emergency landing at because they have the longest runway in the country, giving the pilot as much time as possible to slow down with the reverse thrusters before having to just crash the plane into a bank at the end of the runway (essentially).

They never did name the second airport...
 
deskslave said:
I still don't understand why, if the plane has to be flown around for three hours to burn off fuel anyway, they can't fly those three hours in the direction of Toronto. If you know the tire's blown, it's not going to be any more blown when you get to Toronto.

Remember the Concorde crash? What if you have a later failure that turns catastrophic? Not a good thing, say, like over the Rockies.
 
ducky said:
FOX News folks were saying that LAX is one of two US airports that you'd want to make that emergency landing at because they have the longest runway in the country, giving the pilot as much time as possible to slow down with the reverse thrusters before having to just crash the plane into a bank at the end of the runway (essentially).

They never did name the second airport...

Denver's are over 10,000 - Pittsburgh also.
 
Three of LAX's are longer than 10,000 feet. ... I believe the one I recall them saying the plane landed on was 25R, which is 12,091 feet.
 
I was only passing along what I heard. Doesn't mean they were right, just that's what they were saying.
 
Helluva ride, I bet.

I guess he fared better than when I crashed my simulator, today. Twice.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top