Albany Times-Union Editor: I know something you don't know!

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

Flying Headbutt

Active Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2002
Messages
18,515
http://timesunion.com/AspStories/story.asp?storyID=639874&category=REXSMITH&BCCode=&newsdate=11/19/2007

Responsible journalism that stays above the fray of gossip and innuendo, for once? Or just covering for a politician?
 
What horsebleep.

Why wave this around as an example of responsible journalism? I don't even agree. I think sitting on the lap of a drunken congressman (I presume in a moving vehicle) is enough bad judgment to warrant you getting your name in the papers.

You keep on being holier than thou, though Rexie.
 
Flying Headbutt said:
http://timesunion.com/AspStories/story.asp?storyID=639874&category=REXSMITH&BCCode=&newsdate=11/19/2007

Responsible journalism that stays above the fray of gossip and innuendo, for once? Or just covering for a politician?

Can't be the former when you adopt a "na-na-na-na na-nah" tone, that's for sure.

The "go knock yourselves out on Google, folks" line was what irked me most. I can accept "we're not going to pander to lurid curiosity" because I think a newspaper should be more responsible with what it prints (except for the fact that I do think her identity is newsworthy, on this one.) But there's nothing worse than when someone feels compelled to explain, at length and to the world, how righteous they feel about themselves.
 
markvid said:
But I bet their newsroom has gone 110% to find a pic of her.

Yes. We won't ID her in the paper, but check online where she is modeling lingerie on our website.
 
This is the same guy who, a week ago, defended his reporter and editors for running a story that talked about riding with a guy do 160 mph on the Northway (I-87) in the rain on a Friday afternoon and never responded to the guy's contention that it was fabricated.

I hate it, hate it, hate it when journalists take that snotty tone, on purpose or not.

That said, I generally like the paper.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
This is ridiculous. Of course she should be identified. Anybody remember Fannie Foxe and Wilbur Mills?

And the snotty tone makes it even worse.
 
This faux standards bull**** is just that, bull****.

I was half expecting him to type nanny-nanny-nanny, neener-neener.
 
hahahahah, can't wait until within the next two days someone posts the woman's identity alongside a big FU to that editor.
 
The tone did strike me as rather superior. Then again, columns usually sound that way when columnists feel they need to explain a newspaper's process to the general readership.
 
shotglass said:
The tone did strike me as rather superior. Then again, columns usually sound that way when columnists feel they need to explain a newspaper's process to the general readership.

Whereas most of us here know what generally goes on, so to us it's nothing but horse****.
 
the name should be in the police report - which is public record. stupid column. print it or don't
 
I agree. Column is holier than thou.

I know this is off topic, but does anyone else wonder how she wasn't in violation of the seat belt law? She sat on his lap and buckled in? Seems sort of kinky.
 
deadliner said:
I agree. Column is holier than thou.

I know this is off topic, but does anyone else wonder how she wasn't in violation of the seat belt law? She sat on his lap and buckled in? Seems sort of kinky.

She wasn't charged with a violation of the seat belt law.

Doesn't mean she wasn't guilty.
 
The TU has competition in Troy, Schenecetady, Saratoga and Glens Falls.
Maybe one of them will have the guts to print the name.
This ex-Congressman has a bad record when it comes to domestic issues.
He drinks, beat the crap out of his ex-wife and got her to lie about it in a last-ditch effort to get re-elected.
Good riddance.
 
tapintoamerica said:
Seems to me this thing should address whether the guy is married.

An earlier article does, if you're interested:
http://www.timesunion.com/AspStories/story.asp?storyID=638244&TextPage=1

Apparently still going through a divorce.
 
i think a column could have been written without coming off as a **** fairly easily ... if a column even was necessary.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top