Adventures in headline writing, or why Lovie Smith made Coakley lose

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

Bob Cook

Active Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2004
Messages
10,190
Or maybe Jerry Angelo is at fault. Anyway, another reminder to be precise with headlines:

http://rawstory.com/2010/01/headline-white-house-bears-part-blame-senate-loss/

A story filed Wednesday afternoon by Reuters seemed to suggest the White House had blamed the Chicago Bears football team for losing Ted Kennedy's Senate seat in Massachusetts.

The headline, which ran above a Reuters story on the New York Times' website, was titled, "White House Says Bears Part Of Blame For Senate Loss."

It turned out the story meant to say that the White House said it bore some of the responsibility for losing the Massachusetts Senate seat. It didn't mean to say that Obama's hometown team was to blame for a congressional race roughly a thousand miles away.
 
BearInWoods.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
this is sorta like the headline that is on the ESPN main page right now: "Celtics' Davis curses heckler"

had to click on the story to find out it was about Big Baby yelling a curse word, not Big Baby making a voo doo doll...
 
"We're here, we're queer, we don't want any more bears!"

angry_homer_simpson.jpg



This reminds me of one of those headlines about a death: "[Michael Jackson] dies Thursday" ... like he's about to be executed or something.
 
The Bears could **** up a one car funeral so I'm not surprised they had a hand in this defeat.
 
Did someone just say that Coakley actually RAN a campaign? That sure is news to me.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top