Advance Publications Beg-a-thon

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

The Star Ledger and nj.com are both non-union, so the axe can fall at any time. It appears today's public plea for new subscribers is a desperation move. I expect little success in generating new subscribers, so job cuts will result. Interestingly, nj.com is the only instate news site by a day paper without a paywall.
Our journalism needs your support more than ever. Please subscribe to NJ.com.
What is the alternative? Give up? More than a few readers are asking places like Advance sites how they can help keep the journalism pipeline going.
 
What is the alternative? Give up? More than a few readers are asking places like Advance sites how they can help keep the journalism pipeline going.
I'd rather read something like that than the condescending stuff the top brass write when they announce slashed salaries, furloughs and layoffs and buyouts. You never know. Some rich person might give a couple million. Worth a shot.
 
Newspapers need to get to brass tax and have a "vote off." Put pictures of two staffers up - they get to write a blurb about why they deserve to stay and how much their job means to them. Vote is open only to subscribers. There was one big banner headline on one local site I check out - a funeral home offering specials on creamation.
 
Newspapers need to get to brass tax and have a "vote off." Put pictures of two staffers up - they get to write a blurb about why they deserve to stay and how much their job means to them. Vote is open only to subscribers. There was one big banner headline on one local site I check out - a funeral home offering specials on creamation.

giphy.gif
 
The Advance Publications model is:

1) Remove no-layoffs policy - "‘no full-time, non-represented, regular employee will ever be laid off because of economic conditions or because of the introduction of new technology"

2) Tell everyone that there are no immediate plans of layoffs

3) Get rid of presses; layoff production people; Implement two weeks of furloughs for everyone else (essentially paycuts)

4) Appoint new leaders, i.e. hatchet men (offer buyouts, layoff people if not enough accept buyout package)

5) Create new entities; Don't offer jobs to everyone in those new companies - Out with the old (expensive) in with the new (cheap) - "We launched XXX Advance Media to position our affiliated
companies for the future in a rapidly evolving digital landscape and we're pleased with our progress. MANY local employees of (previous entity) will be offered jobs with XXX Advance Media, although there will be SOME job losses."

6) Sell assets (buildings); move into smaller rental boutique newsrooms. Not enough room for ALL in the new facility so cut even deeper; tell public the reorganization will better position both
the newspaper and its web affiliate to focus on a real-time approach to distributing news.

7) Don't put up a paywall; instead opt for a Beg-A-Thon

Is #8 turn off the lights, the party is OVER?
 
Newspapers need to get to brass tax and have a "vote off." Put pictures of two staffers up - they get to write a blurb about why they deserve to stay and how much their job means to them. Vote is open only to subscribers. There was one big banner headline on one local site I check out - a funeral home offering specials on creamation.

Where is this? I need to sign up.
 
Why is asking for people to subscribe and support journalism seen as begging?
 
Exactly. The newspaper industry screwed up 20 years ago in giving away the product. But it can't just give up. Time to educate people that news doesn't appear on its own.
 
Why is asking for people to subscribe and support journalism seen as begging?
Bryan Curtis' recent article about Maven probably expresses the sentiment better than I can, but - On one hand, of course I don't want to see more reporters lose jobs, and I don't begrudge my friends asking for support who still work for Gatehouse - which seems like a kissin' cousin of Advance, from the description of the tactics in this thread.

On the other hand, these ****s are a lot of what's wrong with journalism nowadays - acquire a paper, strip down to its barest parts, and then cut a little deeper than that, too. Like for a lot of these markets, I'm not sure if it would ultimately be better if the papers survive, or, if the existing product is abandoned and someone just starts fresh X months or years later.
 
About 10 years ago Advance tripled down on the Internet, killed off the Ann Arbor News among other moves, all the while smugly proclaiming “we got this” while failing to upgrade POS sites that still take forever to load. In 2020.
 
Last edited:
Because, in this case at least, you're essentially asking for a *donation* to a corporation owned by one of the richest families in the world in order to support a content farm.

Exactly. Just did a $700M cash deal to acquire Ironman Group during the same week they were busting the union in Cleveland. As I outlined earlier what happened to their "No Layoff" policy? Playing the shell game with their employees and "Media Groups". A bunch of frauds and they get what they deserve - which isn't my $10 a month. Plus most of their content is garbage and culled from other outlets.

If you want to know the playbook, may I suggest "Hell or High Water" by Rebecca Theim? She outlines what they did to the New Orleans Times-Picayune. Which is basically what they are doing to all of their properties.
 
Our small daily made some moves this week, including putting up one of these donation pleas:
• We went from five days a week to three (we were seven days a week as recently as two or three years ago)
• Tripled our print edition price from 50 cents during the week and $1.50 on Sunday, to $1.50 across the board (mostly so our main circulation person doesn't have to constantly change the racks, was what I was told)
• Introduced several subscription tiers to help retain the inevitable cancellations
• And started a plan to switch our web site to a different platform that will help us turn more toward a subscription-based model, which means more of an emphasis on web content on the days we don't publish.

Of course, all of these moves have brought out the assholes in the community who want to see us fail. I'm a live and let live person, but I might dance a jig if some of them caught the virus and had their house burn down.

One thing I think it's safe to say will come out of all of this, is that it will stomp the accelerator on the death of the print edition at most papers. It's mostly been kept alive as a cash cow to generate ad revenue. If that slows to the point where it's not worth it, why bother? If we had 20 years before print editions mostly went away, that might have been cut at least in half.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top