23 Reasons Why J.R. Moehringer can't write a profile about Pete Carroll

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

Double Down

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2002
Messages
14,349
Written by J.R. Moehringer for LA Magazine.

This, kind souls, is writing. Best magazine piece I've read in awhile.

Interested, though, to hear your thoughts. (It ran two weeks ago, but I didn't see it until today.) Too gimmicky? Sincere? Brilliant? Phony? Remember, Tom Wolfe once wrote about hot rod culture in Southern California simply by writing a letter to editor Byron Dobell that contained all the notes he took.

Also, I think a word was dropped from the end of the first bullet point on the web version. I assume it's supposed to say "Accepting his loan of a shirt might have been unethical."
 
Given the time, J.R. Moehringer doesn't have a contemporary.
That was fabulous on so many levels. A difficult, cornering framework. Yet kept pace. That was fun. Thanks.

(There will be Gary Smith shouts, and they're heard.)
 
Good Lord.

After finishing that, I had to go back and read the old DD post about newspaper hacks and Gary Smith and Tim O'Brien and insecurity, just to convince myself I'm not as hopelessly incompetent as Mr. Moehringer made me feel.

Nothing short of brilliant.
 
That was incredible. Easily one of the best pieces I've ever read. Fun read all the way through, and a damn interesting (not gimmicky) way to tell the story of Pete Carroll.

Now, if you'd excuse me, I'm going to go do some pushups on my couch.
 
It's the kind of story that reminds me this: Even though I can't do it this well, this is the reason why I do what I do.

I loved the physical descriptions in this part of the piece.

7. I’M UNABLE TO DESCRIBE CARROLL’S APPEARANCE WITHOUT SOUNDING GAY

Most football coaches are bald, pear-shaped sourpusses. They look like Southern sheriffs, circa 1954. But Carroll is a Hollywood fever dream, a hybrid of Knute Rockne and a rock star. (Folk rock.) He looks like a man who spends his days in the sun. Not the bad sun, the sun of Marlboro Men and aging soap opera actors, but the good sun, the sun of tennis pros and yachtsmen. He’s not leathery, just burnished. His eyes are bright Caribbean blue, and the browner his skin gets, the bluer his eyes turn. His nose is slightly zigzag. It breaks left, then right, a runner in the open field, and his chin is jutting, prominent, always pointing the way forward.

His hair, however, might be his signature feature. A puffy palette of white, silver, and gray, it reminds you sometimes of Bill Clinton, other times of **** Van Dyke. Now you see follicular intimations of Richard Gere, now you see flashes of Phil Donahue, now a fleck or two of Jack Kemp. A journalist friend, when I mention that I’m writing a profile of Carroll— before I realized I couldn’t write a profile of Carroll—says the coach has always seemed to him the paragon of kicked-back cool, the Burt Bacharach of coaches. It’s a fine, and fittingly hair-focused, comparison.

He’s taller in person than on TV. Stalking a sideline, he’s always dwarfed by that phalanx of giants in his private Praetorian Guard, but walking the campus he’s taller than most students he passes. He’s also in better shape. He dresses in concealing layers—a blousy polo shirt over a white body shirt, khaki pants— but when he changes in his office, when he’s standing there shirtless, you notice the definition. A USC strength coach says Carroll is a workout fiend, always looking for new ways to get the heart rate up and the body fat down. He lifts weights, boogie-boards under the pier at Hermosa Beach, and after an exhausting morning of meetings and interviews and speeches, he likes nothing better than to run the floor hard with a pickup basketball team. A doctor told him long ago that his knees are bad, bone-on-bone bad, and he should never play basketball again. He doesn’t go to that doctor anymore.

Every year on Carroll’s birthday he vows to throw a football as far as he is old. When he turned 56 in September, he made a point of going out to the field in the morning and chucking the rock 56 yards. He takes visible pride, disarming pride, in telling me that his ball landed with several yards to spare. There is the trace of a smile on his lips as he tells me. There is always the trace of a smile on Carroll’s lips. His effectiveness as a motivator begins and ends with that smile, which is sincere, unrestrained, and wide, though he mixes in half smiles and smirks when being sarcastic. More than the smile, it’s specifically the prospect of a smile that seems to fuel the many people orbiting Carroll all day. They are prepared to go to great lengths, endure significant pain and inconvenience, to earn one of those Carroll high-beamers, and they brighten visibly upon receipt. They become flustered. They turn the colors of a Pacific sunset. They titter.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
Bullwinkle said:
That was incredible. Easily one of the best pieces I've ever read. Fun read all the way through, and a damn interesting (not gimmicky) way to tell the story of Pete Carroll.

Now, if you'd excuse me, I'm going to go do some pushups on my couch.

Exactly. It was such a good piece I didn't even notice that 30 minutes went by while reading it. I already sent the link to a bunch of co-workers and am thinking of sending it to a couple of coaches that I cover.

Thanks for sharing it DD.
 
I just go through point No. 3 and I can't believe what I'm reading. I had to take a quick break just to gather myself. I mean, this is one of the most original approaches to any kind of writing I've ever seen.

The way he connects writing a profile and a football game is fantastic. I never thought of it that way.

Anyway, back to reading.
 
Double Down said:
Even though I can't do it this well, this is the reason why I do what I do.

Thank you, DD. That is exactly what I needed to hear.
 
A wonderful piece, of course, but it always bothers me when someone feels forced to make a gross exaggeration in an attempt to paint a picture.

Most football coaches are bald, pear-shaped sourpusses.

Let's just look at the SEC. Spurrier, Meyer, Richt. Saban. Nutt.

The Philopottamas at Tennessee is the only one who meets the first two criteria.

There are a lot of sourpusses, I guess. But I suspect Carroll was one, too, when he was coaching in the NFL.
 
Moehringer's a tremendous writer. I loved the profile; it presented an aspect of Carroll that I've yet to read anywhere else. But if you want to read his best work, pick up "Tender Bar," which is fantastic.
 
Um. Have a disagreement here. (And, the Pulitzer Board too).

"Resurrecting the Champ." Los Angeles Times Magazine (May 4, 1997)

"Crossing Over." (The Gee's Bend Story) Los Angeles Times (August, 1999)
 
fishwrapper said:
Um. Have a disagreement here. (And, the Pulitzer Board too).

"Resurrecting the Champ." Los Angeles Times Magazine (May 4, 1997)

"Crossing Over." (The Gee's Bend Story) Los Angeles Times (August, 1999)

Seconded. "Resurrecting the Champ" is still the story I turn to when looking for inspiration. IMHO, it has the best ending line by far of any story I've ever read.
 
OK...I said in another thread that I didn't know if it was just me, but there weren't a lot of writers and columns/stories that really impressed me as spectacularly good anymore.

This here is an exception. Just a great, engaging piece.
 
Crap.
I read the first four or so reasons at work today. Decided this was a great story and that I should read the rest of it when I got home.
Now I'm home, and for some reason it won't load. Damn you, Charter Communications!
 
indeed, after a day of searching in vain for parcells, i was looking forward to reading this piece tonight. but it won't come up for me. any tips, friends? ??? ??? ???
 
Yep, son of a ***** is down. Someone type it up for us! :D

I'll second the Tender Bar. A great recommendation I received from someone here. It's basically my life story minus the Pulitzer so far;)
 
The link is working again, for those who missed it yesterday.


Wondering if there are any of you who felt the piece was a bit too fawning. Is there no darkness to be explored in Carroll? Should the Reggie Bush stuff have been so quickly glossed over?
 
Double Down said:
The link is working again, for those who missed it yesterday.


Wondering if there are any of you who felt the piece was a bit too fawning. Is there no darkness to be explored in Carroll? Should the Reggie Bush stuff have been so quickly glossed over?

I thought he bought the Carroll Kool-Aid in that regard (God, I vowed I'd never use that term on this board and what did I just do?). But I can't judge a piece like that based on his take of Carroll--fawning, critical or in between. I'm judging it on his style and writing. Style-wise, he didn't sip the tasty red beverage... He wrote the piece he wanted to, on his own terms, not the terms Carroll was trying to set up for him. That's mainly why I liked it.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top