beardpuller
Active Member
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2004
- Messages
- 1,486
Just wondering if, when you see something wrong in your story in print (a typo, factual error, whatever), how much blame you assess yourself and how much you blame your desk.
I ask because I recently had a discussion about this with another writer who also works on the same staff. I had taken full responsibility for a complicated mistake that started with me, and he was aghast. He felt the people editing the piece should have caught it. My stance was, it would have been nice if they had caught it, but it was my mistake and my responsibility, 100 percent.
I know from talking to the desk that this guy takes the same attitude toward his own work -- spelling, facts, dates, it's all "details" better left to them. He sees himself more or less as the "big picture" guy.
And deskfolk on the board -- do we try to pass the buck to you too much? And if there's a typo in the lede, do you feel as bad about it as the man or woman whose name is on the story?
I ask because I recently had a discussion about this with another writer who also works on the same staff. I had taken full responsibility for a complicated mistake that started with me, and he was aghast. He felt the people editing the piece should have caught it. My stance was, it would have been nice if they had caught it, but it was my mistake and my responsibility, 100 percent.
I know from talking to the desk that this guy takes the same attitude toward his own work -- spelling, facts, dates, it's all "details" better left to them. He sees himself more or less as the "big picture" guy.
And deskfolk on the board -- do we try to pass the buck to you too much? And if there's a typo in the lede, do you feel as bad about it as the man or woman whose name is on the story?