- Joined
- Jan 30, 2003
- Messages
- 19,280
"Awesome Baby, he's a real PTP'er," now that's analysis.
Piotr Rasputin said:I'm just glad that a national audience now knows just what a horrible color commentator "Slick!" Leonard is.
"Boom BABY!!!!" is NOT basketball analysis.
Armchair_QB said:Smallpotatoes said:I never saw what the big deal was in that rivalry. Neither team won a world championship during that decade.
NEW YORK!!!!! THE GARDEN!!!!! SPIKE LEE!!!!!
playthrough said:"Awesome Baby, he's a real PTP'er," now that's analysis.
Smallpotatoes said:Armchair_QB said:Smallpotatoes said:I never saw what the big deal was in that rivalry. Neither team won a world championship during that decade.
NEW YORK!!!!! THE GARDEN!!!!! SPIKE LEE!!!!!
I also thought it was ridiculous how over-hyped and over-analyzed the 1994 Eastern Conference semifinals between the Knicks and the Bulls was. Anyone who just dropped in from another planet might have thought it was finals, that they really were the two best teams in the NBA.
That's why I loved it when the Rockets won the title that year.
I guess I don't care as much about personalities as much as I care about who's the best.
Piotr Rasputin said:I'm just glad that a national audience now knows just what a horrible color commentator "Slick!" Leonard is.
"Boom BABY!!!!" is NOT basketball analysis.
Bob Cook said:Piotr Rasputin said:I'm just glad that a national audience now knows just what a horrible color commentator "Slick!" Leonard is.
"Boom BABY!!!!" is NOT basketball analysis.
At least Slick doesn't have to say much on radio, thanks to Mark Boyle, still my favorite play-by-play radio guy, in part because he's good, but also in part because when he hosted a local radio show he called auto racing "Deathsport" (yes, in Indianapolis) and publicly flayed a state rep on the air, right into his ear while he was on the phone, for writing a letter to the NCAA asking for an investigation about whether Duke's win over Indiana in the '93 final four was fixed.
playthrough said:Smallpotatoes said:Armchair_QB said:Smallpotatoes said:I never saw what the big deal was in that rivalry. Neither team won a world championship during that decade.
NEW YORK!!!!! THE GARDEN!!!!! SPIKE LEE!!!!!
I also thought it was ridiculous how over-hyped and over-analyzed the 1994 Eastern Conference semifinals between the Knicks and the Bulls was. Anyone who just dropped in from another planet might have thought it was finals, that they really were the two best teams in the NBA.
That's why I loved it when the Rockets won the title that year.
I guess I don't care as much about personalities as much as I care about who's the best.
To each their own, but I think rivalries can flourish just fine without one or both teams winning championships. If you weren't in NY or Indy, I can see where this one might not be as compelling. But in those towns, Indy especially as Bob Cook explained, it was plenty big.
GoochMan said:Ain't no rivalries when you suck.
Smallpotatoes said:I never saw what the big deal was in that rivalry. Neither team won a world championship during that decade.
Smallpotatoes said:I never saw what the big deal was in that rivalry. Neither team won a world championship during that decade.
Baron Scicluna said:Smallpotatoes said:I never saw what the big deal was in that rivalry. Neither team won a world championship during that decade.
To me, the big deal was how Miller would go into the Garden and just destroy the Knicks. Even I, as a Knicks fan, respected Miller for not being intimidated by either the Knicks or their fans, and for backing up his trash talking with Spike.