Which Pro Teams Just Need to Go Away?

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

BitterYoungMatador2

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2005
Messages
21,369
The ownership thread got me thinking that we could probably use some serous contraction in all of the professional leagues? Which teams just shouldn't be teams anymore? I'm thinking few, if any, would lose much sleep if the Tampa Bay Rays or Miami Marlins weren't here. How about the New York/New Jersey/Brooklyn Nets, a team that hasn't really developed a devout following despite the Knicks floundering?
 
There's a bunch on NBA teams that can disappear and wouldn't be missed. Sacramento, Indiana, Milwaukee, the Clippers, the already mentioned Nets.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
I thought about this a few years ago regarding the NBA. Purely unscientific.
How many teams are "interesting." The answer I came up with was nine. So nine interesting teams (I don't remember which nine). Therefore, the only interesting games were when two of the nine played each other. Unscientific conclusion: more than two-thirds of the games are meaningless, simply, who cares?
Probably could have done this with the NFL, NHL, MLB, too. But didn't bother.
 
I thought about this a few years ago regarding the NBA. Purely unscientific.
How many teams are "interesting." The answer I came up with was nine. So nine interesting teams (I don't remember which nine). Therefore, the only interesting games were when two of the nine played each other. Unscientific conclusion: more than two-thirds of the games are meaningless, simply, who cares?
Probably could have done this with the NFL, NHL, MLB, too. But didn't bother.

Those nine can change quickly, though. Ten years ago the Warriors and Bucks would not have been among the nine in the NBA. The Spurs would have been.
 
There's a bunch on NBA teams that can disappear and wouldn't be missed. Sacramento, Indiana, Milwaukee, the Clippers, the already mentioned Nets.

Two of those teams were among the four best records in the NBA this season when the season was suspended. One of them was an odds-on favorite to win at least the conference title, if not the whole thing.
 
One of my favorite trivia questions: What was the last team in the four major sports to dissolve? (No moving to another city, or changing its nickname)
 
Two of those teams were among the four best records in the NBA this season when the season was suspended. One of them was an odds-on favorite to win at least the conference title, if not the whole thing.

I realize that, but I was looking more traditionally. The Pacers and Nets had runs to the finals too, but historically these franchises haven’t done much.
 
I think you're thinking of the Cleveland Crusaders. They eventually became the Minnesota Fighting Saints.

Nope. The California Golden Seals moved to Cleveland where they were the Barons for a couple of seasons before folding and merging with the North Stars.

IIRC, the Gund brothers were involved and they somehow still had rights to the Bay Area, so they got the San Jose franchise when it was founded.

Cleveland Barons (NHL) - Wikipedia
 
I think the Squires went belly-up during a season, while the Colonels and Spirits made to the end of that season.
 
The following can go as far as I’m concerned;
Rays
Marlins
Jaguars
Sacramento Kings
Chargers
 
Nope. The California Golden Seals moved to Cleveland where they were the Barons for a couple of seasons before folding and merging with the North Stars.

IIRC, the Gund brothers were involved and they somehow still had rights to the Bay Area, so they got the San Jose franchise when it was founded.

Cleveland Barons (NHL) - Wikipedia
I stand corrected. Thanks for that.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top