what's up w/ Patch.com

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

From a reader standpoint I love The Patch concept since I learned of it's existence about 6 weeks ago. I now find it the best way to stay current on local news and sports. News that I previously had to wait a week to read in local weekly is now available same day.
 
I heard a pitch and it's about changing journalism, using social networking, yada-yada-yada. Most Patch sites don't do anything different than other news websites.
 
I've been contacted by Patch, and the easy thing to do would be to take a job with them, get the slight raise and work out of my office.

And you know what? I'm not doing it.

I think Patch, in a strange, twisted way, is even more unsustainable than newspapers. Eventually, Patch is going to need to generate A TON of online advertising to make this work.

That being said, a lot of decent journalists seem to be popping up there.
 
podunk press said:
I've been contacted by Patch, and the easy thing to do would be to take a job with them, get the slight raise and work out of my office.

And you know what? I'm not doing it.

I think Patch, in a strange, twisted way, is even more unsustainable than newspapers. Eventually, Patch is going to need to generate A TON of online advertising to make this work.

That being said, a lot of decent journalists seem to be popping up there.

Well, to be fair, if you're floating in the ocean and someone throws you a life raft, you're going to grab it ... even if it is made of lead.
 
podunk press said:
Eventually, Patch is going to need to generate A TON of online advertising to make this work.

Does Patch even have a sales staff? Good luck explaining to the local 72-year-old dry cleaner who has never advertised why he should spend money on a web ad that likely will be blocked by your adware.
 
wicked said:
podunk press said:
Eventually, Patch is going to need to generate A TON of online advertising to make this work.

Does Patch even have a sales staff? Good luck explaining to the local 72-year-old dry cleaner who has never advertised why he should spend money on a web ad that likely will be blocked by your adware.

The 72-year-old businessmen are obviously a coveted demographic that only newspapers can penetrate, and they're mostly responsible for papers' continued financial dominance. And also, all old people are stupid and obviously can't use them new-fangled computers, ESPECIALLY if they're somehow "with it" enough to still have a small business in 2010.
 
It's a legit concern. Many weeklies nowadays don't even have the sales staffs to adequately drum up business. And good luck trying to upsell a guy on a web ad, especially if he doesn't know anything about the Internet.

I've heard/seen little about Patch's financial model. It's great they're hiring and investing, but it'd be nice to know if the business plan was solid, too. For instance: How quickly is each site expected to turn a profit? Two months? Two years?
 
wicked said:
Does Patch even have a sales staff?

Nope. That's yet ANOTHER title site editors are expected to take on -- sales guy/gal. That's why in the job description aol says they're seeking "entrepreneurial" journalists -- now that's an oxymoron (write a fluff-piece about my business, and I'll buy an ad). ... The ad/sales dept. and the reporters/editorial dept. are located in separate areas of a newsroom for a reason. ... Again, patch editors are expected to wear too many hats.
 
thedome said:
wicked said:
Does Patch even have a sales staff?

Nope. That's yet ANOTHER title site editors are expected to take on -- sales guy/gal. That's why in the job description aol says they're seeking "entrepreneurial" journalists -- now that's an oxymoron (write a fluff-piece about my business, and I'll buy an ad). ... The ad/sales dept. and the reporters/editorial dept. are located in separate areas of a newsroom for a reason. ... Again, patch editors are expected to wear too many hats.

This is completely false. I've been told repeatedly that we are not to sell ads, and I have people to refer them to. You're either just making stuff up, making assumptions, or basing your statements on things happening in isolated sites.
 
Greenwell's right. I know the guy who's been appointed regional publisher for my neck of the woods, and he's looking for sales talent.
 
I guess I didn't make the cut as a local editor. I'm glad, though, since the regional editor I interviewed with listed cutting staff 30 percent and keeping quality "up" as an achievement. He rubbed me the wrong way and didn't seem to have a clue that Twitter and Facebook are just tools and not the Holy Grail of journalism.
 
Stitch,

I don't know what you're talking about. Don't know how Patch can be cutting staff when they're in the middle of a giant hiring push to fill Patch positions all around.
 
fightingwords1 said:
Stitch,

I don't know what you're talking about. Don't know how Patch can be cutting staff when they're in the middle of a giant hiring push to fill Patch positions all around.

I saw the guy's LinkedIn profile that listed that achievement in a previous job. I'm aware that Patch.com is hiring.
 
The whole thing is built upon the idea of using less staffing and thus less expense than a traditional paper, yeah. I mean, you're not producing a physical paper. While there is a significant tech staff, I imagine that doesn't outnumber all of the other personnel (production staff, delivery, secretarial, etc.) you need with a traditional media outlet.

As far as the news and editorial side solely, I don't think it's that different from a local paper, depending on what area you're in. I'm full-time with a pretty healthy freelance budget that's essentially equivalent to another reporter and a quarter. That's a bit more than both of the weeklies in the area. It's definitely a different idea and model, but at least personally, I think it could thrive in the area where I am. The other companies in the area either aren't making money off the web, or aren't even trying,
 
Stitch said:
fightingwords1 said:
Stitch,

I don't know what you're talking about. Don't know how Patch can be cutting staff when they're in the middle of a giant hiring push to fill Patch positions all around.

I saw the guy's LinkedIn profile that listed that achievement in a previous job. I'm aware that Patch.com is hiring.

Understood. I got confused with the way you'd initially phrased it. Apologies.
 
Huge hiring push in my neck of the woods for this gigs. They are looking for editors and freelancers everywhere. Anyone know what they pay? What's the ceiling on this things? Worth giving a look?
 
mustangj17 said:
Huge hiring push in my neck of the woods for this gigs. They are looking for editors and freelancers everywhere. Anyone know what they pay? What's the ceiling on this things? Worth giving a look?

Standard freelance seems to be $50 for a smaller story, $75 for longer stories with pictures. They might go a bit higher for a take-out piece, though I'm not sure how many of those they do.

No idea what the editors make, but I know one of them and he works insane hours.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top