US Attorneys 86'ed --Part Deux

[Fenian_Bastard]

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/13/washington/13cnd-Attorneys.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin

"Contrary to testimony" is a nice objective touch.

 

[andyouare?]

Guess they forgot to delete that one. God knows what else will come up if they find the lost e-mails of Rove.

 

[Fenian_Bastard]

Apparently, they serve at the pleasure of Karl Rove.
http://www.realcities.com/mld/krwashington//17075348.htm

 

[RokSki]

Frog-march...frog-march...

 

[Fenian_Bastard]

One-two, one-two.
Left-right. Left-right.

 

[D-Backs Hack]

"Contrary to testimony" is a nice objective touch.

It's great the myriad ways the ****-for-brains Washington press corps has come up with more polite terms to describe when these liars lie.

Lord knows they have to develop a new, different phrase every day.

 

[Point of Order]

Actually, I guess you could call it Part Quatre

From the story:
The Justice Department has produced documents at least four times in recent weeks, at times indicating that the latest documents represent the last known material relevant to he inquiry.



Anything other emails, guys? You sure?

 

[Herbert Anchovy]

You're going to be seeing a lot of doctoral dissertations and books on how this administration and the national press corps has implemented language. It's gone far beyond Nixonian "hearts and minds," "silent majority," "peace with honor."

 

[RokSki]

One-two, one-two.
Left-right. Left-right.

Ah, a pleasant thought. :)

 

[Fenian_Bastard]

Parade rest!

 

[Fenian_Bastard]

This is the damndest thing I've read yet.
http://www.law.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=OpenMarket/Xcelerate/Preview&c=LawArticle&cid=1176455062969

Remember that we're in the WAR BETWEEN CIVILIZATIONS! and the DOJ is part of the first line of defense to whom we have to hand over our civil liberties so the brown people won't come and kill us all. Of course, that can't get in the way of crony hires and resume-padding.
WPE

 

[Point of Order]

But, but, but... they serve at the pleasure of the president:

Philip Heymann, a Harvard law professor and former deputy attorney general under Reno, said the Justice Department has always been vulnerable to allegations of playing politics with prosecutions.

"But these allegations are vastly greater and more credible," Heymann said. "Really good attorney generals go out of their way to keep appearances straight as well as realities. I think something serious has been going on, and I think it's terribly important that it come out.

"If politicians were going to the White House and saying they didn't want this or that case brought, and the White House was letting the U.S. attorneys know by firing them, it would be terribly immoral and destructive."

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/13/washington/13cnd-Attorneys.html?pagewanted=2&_r=2&hp

 

[Point of Order]

Bush pulled the trigger on Iglesias.

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/013646.php

 

[Fenian_Bastard]

Count One --Abuse Of Power.

 

[Fenian_Bastard]

All roads lead to Turdblossom.
http://online.wSportsJournalists.com/public/article/SB117668592739670828-NtqMNcTNQjBgap7BI5jhmnL_xXM_20070423.html

Ruh-roh.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/print?id=3046651

 

[zeke12]

Senator Coburn (R - OK) tells Gonzales to resign during testimony.

As I said a long while ago, he ain't making it out of this, despite so many attempts to say nothing happened.

http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/003061.php

 

[JayFarrar]

If Gonzales has lost Crazy Coburn, and it looks that way, Gonzales is toast.

 

[Football_Bat]

I think Coburn is crazy ... like a fox.

It don't take a weatherman to tell which way the wind is blowing.

 

[Ace]

So how long can Alberto hold out? He was toasted and roasted by his own.

 

[Point of Order]

So how long can Alberto hold out? He was toasted and roasted by his own.

The good news is that him leaving will do nothing to slow down the deeper investigation into who was pulling DoJ's strings. That's probably the only thing keeping him hanging in right now.