spnited said:Because some people will never really retire:
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3160597
wicked said:spnited said:Because some people will never really retire:
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3160597
I still think he ends up back with the Giants, especially if Coughlin and Co. fold down the stretch.
wicked said:If he wins another ring there -- doubtful, I know -- he could ride off on everyone's shoulders as Jesus II.
The Dolphins have played half their games within 3 points/to OT. And that is without Thomas mostly, so there is no great shock to the system with him not being there in 2008.Starman said:Miami and Atlanta are both really, really ****ed up.
No.Bob Cook said:I'm probably just a big ignoramous, but doesn't it look like the more successful Belichick gets, the more it looks like Parcells rode his coattails and not the other way around? And am I wrong in thinking Parcells might be -- deep, deep down -- thinking the same thing?
Bob Cook said:I'm probably just a big ignoramous, but doesn't it look like the more successful Belichick gets, the more it looks like Parcells rode his coattails and not the other way around? And am I wrong in thinking Parcells might be -- deep, deep down -- thinking the same thing?
Not really the issue.sportschick said:Bob Cook said:I'm probably just a big ignoramous, but doesn't it look like the more successful Belichick gets, the more it looks like Parcells rode his coattails and not the other way around? And am I wrong in thinking Parcells might be -- deep, deep down -- thinking the same thing?
Other than Belichick sucked donkey **** when he coached the Browns before he hooked up with Parcells.
DanOregon said:I've got to think if the Cowboys really sucked this year, he wouldn't be in such a rush to get back in. The guy has a (richly earned) big ego, but when you see him leave the Pats (then they start winning trophies) so he gets back in with the Cowboys and then leaves the Cowboys and they improve (and he gets the itch again) I don't think its a coincidence. Even if he doesn't take the Falcons gig, I'm sure he enjoys the attention. On ESPN he's just another retired coach.
Simon_Cowbell said:Not really the issue.sportschick said:Bob Cook said:I'm probably just a big ignoramous, but doesn't it look like the more successful Belichick gets, the more it looks like Parcells rode his coattails and not the other way around? And am I wrong in thinking Parcells might be -- deep, deep down -- thinking the same thing?
Other than Belichick sucked donkey **** when he coached the Browns before he hooked up with Parcells.
Parcells hasn't done jack **** on a team without Belichick.
Ever.
Did that just happen....sportschick said:Simon_Cowbell said:Not really the issue.sportschick said:Bob Cook said:I'm probably just a big ignoramous, but doesn't it look like the more successful Belichick gets, the more it looks like Parcells rode his coattails and not the other way around? And am I wrong in thinking Parcells might be -- deep, deep down -- thinking the same thing?
Other than Belichick sucked donkey **** when he coached the Browns before he hooked up with Parcells.
Parcells hasn't done jack **** on a team without Belichick.
Ever.
Come back when you actually add something.