Moderator1
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2002
- Messages
- 32,791
Figured I'd start a new thread rather than digging up the old one
Adam LaRoche goes deep on his decision to walk
Adam LaRoche goes deep on his decision to walk
Deadspin rips it pretty good.
http://deadspin.com/espns-insane-adam-laroche-puff-piece-features-laroche-l-1770710009
Hah that's the story he told his wife.
Is there a single sentence from Keown's story that Deadspin didn't rip off here in the guise of media criticism?
What a bunch of ****heads. ESPN should sue them for copyright infringement.
Lighten up, ****. It was a fun read.
On the scale of things to be outraged about this would seem to have a low priority when compared to say underage sex slaves.Lighten up, ****. It was a fun read.
Except they do this **** all ... the ... time.
It's bull****. They basically reprinted Keown's story. And at least in this case it was in the interest of media criticism. To keep the content flowing, they usually just regurgitate news and rip off huge blocs of text from the people who actually did the reporting.
Whitman's just pissed because LaRoche didn't ask him to tag along.
Did Keown get any corroboration on the underage asian sex slave crusade? I didn't see any, except from Boyer.
Not really. Boyer and LaRoche claim they freed underage asian sex slaves. Is there any corroboration of their claim?Doesn't your second sentence answer your first sentence?
I bet LaRoche is a ****head.