The Jay Glazer dilemma

outofplace · Nov 12, 2013

PCLoadLetter said:
cranberry said:

PCLoadLetter said:

I'm not sure gleefully serving as Incognito's PR monkey did anyone a great service.

Click to expand...

Do you really think viewers' understanding of the story would be better had Glazer not done that interview?

Again, was there a better way for Fox to handle that story line?

Click to expand...

He could have done it honestly. That would help viewers understand it better.

Allowing Incognito to mislead people with full knowledge that he is misleading people and not doing a thing to correct it did not help viewers' understanding of the story. It hurt their understanding of the story.

Exactly. There was no attempt at balance. No attempt at fairness. They acted as public relations hacks for Incognito and passed it off to journalism. Cran, you should know better than to think there is nothing wrong with this.

Inky_Wretch · Nov 13, 2013

Glazer defends himself from critics.

http://mmqb.si.com/2013/11/13/jay-glazer-richie-incognito-interview/?eref=sihp

outofplace · Nov 13, 2013

Inky_Wretch said:
Glazer defends himself from critics.

http://mmqb.si.com/2013/11/13/jay-glazer-richie-incognito-interview/?eref=sihp

More lies about the lack of restrictions. Yawn.

LongTimeListener · Nov 13, 2013

Glazer having trouble keeping his story straight. He initially tweeted that he didn't ask about the golf club because it wasn't part of this story. Now he says he did ask about it but Incognito cited a gag order.

I'm reminded of the saying "the only story you don't have to remember is the truth."

Boom_70 · Sep 9, 2014

**** Whitman said:
I'm not shocked that this site doesn't have a huge problem with Glazer or Verducci.

A few years ago, a majority of the site's power-brokers put up an impassioned defense for an MLB.com employee who was judging the APSE awards. Conflict of interest, they said, was irrelevant when the fox in the henhouse happened to be a "good guy."

Has Jay Glazer rung in yet on Ray Rice?