Terry Ganey on what happened to the Columbia Daily Tribune when GateHouse bought the paper.
The Tribune’s “Tragedy” | Gateway Journalism Review
The Tribune’s “Tragedy” | Gateway Journalism Review
Frederick We have been waiting for you. Were you on vacation?Good story. Those moguls in Manhattan figured out a way to make big bucks (for themselves) in buying newspapers from crotchety old (former) publishers/owners. Good for them I guess, but they certainly preyed on an industry and helped wreck it. Those moguls deserve credit for figuring out a way to make big time cash (for themselves) by gutting newspapers.
Frederick We have been waiting for you. Were you on vacation?
He got trapped in that 10 a.m. meeting.
Frederick We have been waiting for you. Were you on vacation?
After the section of the newsroom that contained the copy desk was vacated, the lights were no longer turned on in that area. “It became a black hole,” Jackson said. “It had an incredibly demoralizing effect on the newsroom, like you were taking one of the organs out of our body.”
Gatehouse is going to be rumored as a buyer for any paper, largely because they are very active buyers, and no one else is nearly as as active. Cox has tried to sell Austin and Palm Beach before and pulled them back. They may have qualms about selling to Gatehouse. Since Cox is privately held and has a hell of a lot of money they can afford to wait.I am hearing through various sources that GateHouse is now the leading contender for the Austin paper. But these sources are third-hand, and I hope they're wrong for the sake of the folks at the American-Statesman (and its readers).
The Gatehouse model is inarguably bad for journalism. That said, it's more than optimistic to think that Columbia, Mo., could support two daily newspapers under any circumstances.
When I was at Mizzou years and years ago, the Tribune had its own pipeline to the J-School and made extensive use of students as part-timers. It was a great source of cheap, temporary reporters and editors for them. I don't see that mentioned in the article, so maybe students' role on the staff has diminished.The Missourian makes this a different situation. Students earn nothing while working there, and the editors are already employees of the university. It’s a special situation.
When I was at Mizzou years and years ago, the Tribune had its own pipeline to the J-School and made extensive use of students as part-timers. It was a great source of cheap, temporary reporters and editors for them. I don't see that mentioned in the article, so maybe students' role on the staff has diminished.