Dick Whitman
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 1, 2009
- Messages
- 45,703
For the last 20 years, baseball writers have flogged themselves (and been flogged) for their coverage of the 1998 home run chase, and the offensive explosion in general during the so-called Steroid Era. It's probably deserved. Given access, they blew the one story that mattered.
There has been some discussion on the Weinstein thread about how specific publications and reporters were intimidated out of running stories, for example, so this has been touched on a bit already. But the parallel really interests me: Do the people who have been writing largely fawning celebrity profiles the last 20-plus years have blood on their hands in the same way that people who were covering the baseball beat in the late '90s do? Did access come with blinders?
At least in baseball, the only thing under assault was the record books. Does the celebrity press need to have the kind of reckoning that the BBWAA has been going through?
There has been some discussion on the Weinstein thread about how specific publications and reporters were intimidated out of running stories, for example, so this has been touched on a bit already. But the parallel really interests me: Do the people who have been writing largely fawning celebrity profiles the last 20-plus years have blood on their hands in the same way that people who were covering the baseball beat in the late '90s do? Did access come with blinders?
At least in baseball, the only thing under assault was the record books. Does the celebrity press need to have the kind of reckoning that the BBWAA has been going through?