P
Fenian_Bastard said:Bad link.
Pulitzer Wannabe said:Fenian_Bastard said:Bad link.
No, you've got to register.
That's always annoyed me about that site.
henryhenry said:Pulitzer Wannabe said:Fenian_Bastard said:Bad link.
No, you've got to register.
That's always annoyed me about that site.
i got it without registering.
you don't have to.
good interview. he's a pro.
henryhenry said:found this post on Baseball Think Factory vis-a-vis the interview:
What do you look to a beat writer for? I don't want his analysis, and with ESPN and the internet, you don't need just those 1-2 guys following a club to break daily news anymore. I'm trying to think of the times that I actually seek out the beat writers' stories - the first thing leaps to mind is Spring Training, where half of what they report is color/background info on what type of guy Brian Schneider is, what Moises Alou did during the offseason, and Nelson Figueroa's curious path back to the majors through Mexico and Taiwain.
You're right, we don't need them for hard news any more. And I don't give a **** about the color stuff, so that's why I find them largely useless.
The most pathetic thing you can read on a blog is the sheeple posting that Mainstreamer has no sources.
Unfortunately, most of them don't. The guys like Robo add real value.
I think the real issue is that we're going from a world with 2000 (totally made up number) professional baseball writers and zero bloggers/amateurs to a world of 500 professionals and 10,000 bloggers/amateurs.
henryhenry said:of course he's misguided - beat reporters are the backbone.
but you wonder why and how he came to that point - and how many fans think the same way...
In Exile said:Sometimes I get the interviews, sometimes I don't. I've tried to register but never received confirmation back - too many glitches for me to bother with anymore, and that's too bad.