SMG interviews Gwen Knapp

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

Joined
Aug 18, 2005
Messages
14,163
http://www.sportsmediaguide.com/interviews/gwen-knapp/

She has an intertesting take on steroids....

With all due respect, I think referencing doping purely as cheating is grossly simplistic. As the BALCO story unfolded, I hated that whenever a new revelation about doping came out, one of the first questions would be about his Hall of Fame credentials. It’s so “how was the play, Mrs. Lincoln?’’
That attitude puts doping in the same realm as throwing a spitball. I just can’t see the parallel between manipulating one’s hormones and applying Vaseline to a baseball. Actually, I can see it. I just think it’s ludicrous to give it any attention.
To me, doping is like drunken driving, a public-health issue. I want to know whether Bonds and McGwire will develop cancers or strokes or heart problems. I want to know what they took, how much and for how long. I want to know what changes they saw in their bodies as they progressed in their regimens. If either of them stepped up and provided what I believed to be the truth, without getting a book deal or a plea bargain out of it, I’d consider that a form of greatness.


One thing I think she nailed...
It supported my theory that newspapers need to give readers the kind of stuff that most bloggers can’t. A lot of them do a very good job of expounding on information that is widely available, and in a competitive marketplace, we should try to avoid duplicating what largely unpaid writers can do just as well, and sometimes better. If we don’t do something different, why should we get paid?
 
steroids may be a 'public health' issue if you're a parent

but if you're a baseball fan it's cheating

don't see how she splits that hair

funny line about "biting during sex"

she's a good writer
 
Her opinion is her opinion... but to some people sports lose some of their integrity when athletes exhibit behavior that violates the spirit of fair play. And to many fans, athletes who doped, violated that spirit of fair play and subverted the rules. To those people, it *is* a cheating issue. To not understand that, is to not understand how a lot of people view sports -- whether you personally agree that it is a big deal or not that some athletes illicitly doped to gain an advantage.
 
Gwen is good.

I have a print-out of her column from Sept. 18, 1997 saved in a basketball-leather bound folder from my freshman year which is signed by Costas — long before I realized the ignorance of my admiration.

The column is still one of my favorites, for noticing the details in an evening of drama. Plus, I was there for the game.

I'd link it the column I could find it. Here are the highlights:

Lede: "The home plate umpire wore an anachronism, a chest protector from an era without cell phones or e-mail. An era with a World Series every year no matter what.

The whole umpiring crew looked odd, in glossy new blac jackets, Giants caps and, for Bruce Froemming at home, the outdated external shield, a bulky sponge protruding from all angles. Their luggage had be lost on the way to Candlestick, ensuring that one more element of Wednesday night's game would transcend the ordinary."

Later: "In place of a vaudeville routine, the Giants and Dodgers gave us baseball at its finest. They blew sincere kisses to their sport."

Later: "After Bonds hit a two-run homer in the first, his trek around the bases melded vindication and childlike joy. He pirouetted as he ran toward first, raising his arms to the crowd. At third base, he stomped on the bag."

Next: "There were 56,000 people in the park, waving neon-orange signs that said, "Beat L.A." A few of them left in handcuffs Most simply left happy."

Kicker: "Now, the clubhouse TVs were tuned to Debra Winger's deathbed scene in 'Terms of Endearment," and the Dodgers were in the visitors' clubhouse, separated from the Giants by only a hallway and one game in the standings."
 
She might be the best, but the column you're citing strikes me as amazingly lame.

That's the kind of thing you write when you have no time to get anything good -- you fill with a couple of grafs about the sunset and two more about the crisp whiteness of the home uniforms.

I'm sure she's done much better work.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
Smasher_Sloan said:
I'm sure she's done much better work.

... and you'd be right. This was posted at the end of the piece:

Gwen Knapp, San Francisco Chronicle, May 4, 2004:
Just when we thought we had a pure and simple hero, a millionaire athlete who gave up wealth and fame to become the ideal patriot, to make the ultimate sacrifice, his friends and family complicated everything. They turned Pat Tillman into a human being Monday, showing us what was really lost during that ambush in Afghanistan, insisting that we question every assumption we’ve made since he died an icon on April 22.
Yes, there were uplifting tales, moments when tears and pride swelled in everyone watching Tillman’s memorial service at the San Jose Municipal Rose Garden. There were jarring moments, too, and they carried the message of the afternoon — “challenge yourself” — more powerfully than those laden with conventional inspiration.
Tillman’s youngest brother, Rich, wore a rumpled white T-shirt, no jacket, no tie, no collar, and immediately swore into the microphone. He hadn’t written anything, he said, and with the starkest honesty, he asked mourners to hold their spiritual bromides.
”Pat isn’t with God,” he said. “He’s f — ing dead. He wasn’t religious. So thank you for your thoughts, but he’s f — ing dead.”
What? This didn’t happen for God, as well as country? A professional athlete turned soldier, and we’re supposed to believe that he’d have no use for piety? Robbed of a cliche, where does that leave us?
Challenge yourself.
His brother-in-law and close friend, Alex Garwood, described how Tillman handled his duties when he became godfather to Garwood’s son. He came to the ceremony dressed as a woman. Not as a religious commentary. He was doing a balancing act.
”We had two godfathers, no godmother,” Garwood explained. And what NFL player turned Army Ranger wouldn’t don drag to make that math work?
Who on earth was this guy?
He was the same person who often talked late into the night with his linebackers coach at ASU, prying apart stereotypes about college football players and future soldiers.
”He talked about gays,” Lyle Setencich, the former ASU assistant said. “He asked me, ‘Could you coach gays?’ “Setencich told Tillman yes. He could, and he had. He repeated that at the memorial service, televised on ESPN, in front of the sports world, showing another side of a coach, another side of an American hero.
Challenge yourself.
Tillman talked about everything, with everyone. According to the speakers, he had read the Bible, the Koran, the Book of Mormon, Ralph Waldo Emerson, Henry David Thoreau, and he underlined passages constantly. Garwood recalled how he’d mail articles to friends, highlighting certain parts and writing in the margins: “Let’s discuss.” A quotation from Emerson, found underlined in Tillman’s readings, adorned the program.
It concluded with this: “But the great man is he who in the midst of the crowd keeps with perfect sweetness the independence of solitude.”
Yet he was a team player. When the Arizona Cardinals lost their kicker early in a game, Tillman cut into a conversation between the team trainer and head coach Dave McGinnis. “You know who’s kicking off for us now, don’t you?” McGinnis said, quoting Tillman, a safety who had no real credentials for the kicking job. Most pro athletes wouldn’t risk humiliating themselves that way.
”Pat didn’t want to be the focal point, but he liked being out front,” McGinnis said, “if that makes any sense.”
Tillman’s roommate in the pros, Zack Walz, took a newspaper clipping to the podium and read about how he and some Cardinals teammates had made up faux dog tags for themselves, declaring their unit a band of warriors. “Soldiers, battlers, lay it on the line,” Walz said, sniffling as he scanned the clip. “What the hell did we know? Listen to the words. Listen to the metaphors. … How hollow they ring.”
When Tillman came home late last year from his first tour of duty, Walz said that he understood the difference now, what genuine war and real dog tags meant. A couple of weeks later, he received a gift in the mail, Tillman’s dog tags.
”I’m holding them in my hand now,” Walz said, “but they will never be this far from my heart again.”
Tillman’s respect for his former teammate holds another lesson. Since he died, it has been fashionable to contrast his sense of duty with the petulance and inflated sense of importance in modern athletes. Still, Tillman was an athlete as much as he was a soldier.
It has been said over and over that he wouldn’t want to be revered while we ignore the other soldiers lost in Iraq and Afghanistan. Would he want his former friends in football belittled, their values bashed as a way to measure his sacrifice? That’s too easy.
Challenge yourself.
By the time the ceremony ended, after his brother and brother-in-law sipped the Guinness that Garwood poured in Tillman’s honor, the funny, thinking, wild, crazy man had come to life. The family’s loss, the loss of every soldier’s family, seemed more real.
Tillman wasn’t an icon anymore. He was a man you wanted to know, to spend time with, to lift a Guinness alongside. But that had become impossible, the price of war, because his brother was right. Pat is dead. He’s f — ing dead.
 
I swear I am not disparaging Ms. Knapp, but when the brother of the deceased tells the assembled, ”Pat isn’t with God. He’s f — ing dead. He wasn’t religious. So thank you for your thoughts, but he’s f — ing dead,” your day as a columnist is pretty much made.
 
Smasher_Sloan said:
I swear I am not disparaging Ms. Knapp, but when the brother of the deceased tells the assembled, ”Pat isn’t with God. He’s f — ing dead. He wasn’t religious. So thank you for your thoughts, but he’s f — ing dead,” your day as a columnist is pretty much made.

That absolutely helps your day, but it doesn't write that column for you.
 
If you can't write a compelling column from that scene, get out of the business.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top