Way, way, wayyyyy too breathlessly excited on them, plus, it sounds like an amateur operation because they don't edit out the "geez I hope this phone call works!" stuff.Been underwhelmed with the updates so far. They have been too confusing and a little gossipy.
Season 2 ended rather abruptly. I liked the part of the last episode dealing with whether the search Bergdahl leading to any US soldier deaths. Tying it into whatever overarching point they were trying to make seemed a little forced. I guess there was never going to be a neat resolution to the season but the fact that she didn't have direct access to him really hurt the season.
Definitely agree. I think the "who done it?" or mystery format works better for what they're doing. This whole season, it felt like they were biting off more than they could chew.The more I listened to it (haven't listened to the last episode yet), the more I thought that they just picked the wrong story/case for this format. With no direct access to Bergdahl, it was going to be tough to have any meaningful discoveries. The whole thing has felt like a rehashing of a story we've already heard. I have mostly listened to it as background noise when I'm doing something else, as opposed to the first season when I was hooked on every word.
You base that on what? I listened to the podcast and thought he may well have but I heard nothing that made it as clear as it should be for a conviction. And I'm not saying that in a NO YOU ARE WRONG manner. Just curious what makes it clear to you
You base that on what? I listened to the podcast and thought he may well have but I heard nothing that made it as clear as it should be for a conviction. And I'm not saying that in a NO YOU ARE WRONG manner. Just curious what makes it clear to you
Yeah, I stopped listening to the second one after four or five segments.Ol' Sarah really hooked me in the first five minutes of the first Serial: Can *you* remember what you were doing for 3 hours on this date, a couple of years ago?
The second Serial, to me, never had such a hook.
This is similar to my line of thinking. If I was on a jury, I don't think I could vote to convict him. But he's got a decent motive, and throughout the podcast even with Sarah putting him in the best possible light, he still seemed so evasive to me. There also isn't a credible alternative suspect - The Internet Slueths on Reddit usually focus on Jay (who has way less of a motive than Adnan) and a serial killer that was active in the area (but who's MO doesn't match this case).The short answer is, it makes far more sense to me than any other possible explanation. He was a jilted ex-boyfriend (a fact that Sarah pooh-poohed to a strange degree). His explanation for loaning his car was farcical. There were parts of his story I simply didn't believe, and they weren't outweighed by arguments over cell-phone tracking.
I don't know that there's enough to convict him beyond a reasonable doubt... but I think he did it.
What about the new dude? Can't remember his name. Any reason to think he could have been involved in any way? They may have discussed that and I'm blanking on it