Sank or sunk

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

Enlighten me by telling me which number definition applies to the sun. And don't try 14c. That's in reference to a fixed setting, as in a diamond or, in the example given, a nail.

Now, since you're little brain can't fathom the point I'm making, I'll let you off the hook by telling you the sun most certainly can set. It doesn't need to be defined specifically in Webster's to make it so.

For the sake of journalism, get over yourself and your little rules. You most certainly can sink a putt, just as easily as you can make a basket -- even though in your mind somebody at the AMF company actually made the basket on an assembly line, and, hey, it hasn't actually been a basket for decades; it's more like a mesh tube.

Suck rocks.
 
I am very concerned when a so-called journalist tells me to get over my "little rules" about proper usage and grammar. Those "little rules" are essential tools of our trade.

I am very, very concerned when a so-called journalist says "it doesn't need to be defined specifically" to make it so. Something that is not defined specifically has little use in journalism.

I am also extremely concerned when a so-called journalist gets their facts from a post on SportsJournalists.com, so here is the enlightenment for which you asked: http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/set

I think you will find that Merriam-Webster (or any other dictionary) offers a much more complete definition than fishwrapper's post. And just so there's no confusion, it's definition number 6a under the intransitive verb entry.

But thanks for letting me off the hook.

Your "make a basket" example is irrelevant because, according to Merriam Webster, you can make a basket. See definition 3b here: http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/basket

You are correct when you say my "little brain can't fathom the point" you are making because you haven't yet made a point that is valid. I contend that the phrase "sank a putt" is grammatically incorrect. Please enlighten me as to how that phrase is grammatically correct.
 
LazyReporter said:
I am very concerned when a so-called journalist tells me to get over my "little rules" about proper usage and grammar. Those "little rules" are essential tools of our trade.

I am very, very concerned when a so-called journalist says "it doesn't need to be defined specifically" to make it so. Something that is not defined specifically has little use in journalism.

You are correct when you say my "little brain can't fathom the point" you are making because you haven't yet made a point that is valid. I contend that the phrase "sank a putt" is grammatically incorrect. Please enlighten me as to how that phrase is grammatically correct.

Your posts scream Editor With An Asshole So Tight You Can't Jam A Pica Pole Up There With If You Shot It Out Of A Bazooka From Point-Blank Range.

Dude, I feel sorry for your readers and, if you are an editor, the writers on your staff. Writing is an art. Making everything so freaking literal and rigidly defined must make you a real joy.

My reference to your little rule isn't about quoting dictionaries (more illustration that you must be a laugh-riot at the water cooler). I was referring to your bad-ass edict that you cannot sink a putt.

From third graph of July 2005 Frank Deford story:
Incredibly, Jacklin eagled the 17th hole to level the match. With only one hole left, the whole Ryder Cup was at a tie. On the 18th green, Nicklaus had a four-foot putt for par, Jacklin a two-footer. Nicklaus sank his putt. It was Jacklin's turn.

From fourth graph of July 2005 Joe Posnanski column:
He wrecked it again Monday, wrecked it with an 11-foot putt that dropped in the heart of the cup and, one more time, left Kansas City's Tom Watson staggered, stunned and in second place in his own hometown. This was five years after Quigley sank a 12-foot putt to beat Watson in Kansas City.

From fourth graph of May 2006 Bud Shaw column:
By the time he reached the final hole and sank a birdie putt to a roar from the crowd, he waved at his golf ball as if to say "So, now you go in."

From third graph of July 2003 Randall Mell story:
He watched one of the most dramatic conclusions in U.S. Women's Open history on television, wondering if the tension could get any thicker when Stanford sank a 24-foot birdie to tie Lunke for the lead at the final hole.

From fourth graph of May 2000 Randall Mell story:
When Stewart sank that last putt at Pinehurst and punched his fist into the air, Mickelson's heart sank. It made him 0 for 28 in major championships. At the time, he wanted a chance at Stewart in a Monday playoff. Of course, he didn't know his wife, Amy, would give birth to their first child, Amanda, on that same Monday. He didn't know Stewart would die in a plane crash four months later.

From lead of July 2005 Bill Plaschke column:
Lining up a 13-foot birdie putt on the final hole, he knew he had one chance at a fitting goodbye.

He said it.

He sank it.


From fourth graph of August 2006 Mark Whicker story:
Nothing on Saturday indicated he wouldn't. Woods missed the first green, sank a long putt for par anyway, and didn't miss another. He had eight birdies and hit some shots that deserve prominent play in his own endless highlight video.

From first graph of April 2006 Alan Shipnuck SI piece:
Ten years. Has it really been that long? The sights and sounds of that wrenching day remain indelible. Who will ever forget Greg Norman falling to his knees after almost holing his eagle chip on the 15th hole, his head thrown back in anguish, looking like Y.A. Tittle in that famous old photo? There was that awkward, muffled cheer when Nick Faldo sank his birdie putt on the final hole, the now three-time Masters champ looking almost embarrassed.

From July 2003 Bob Verdi piece:
Verplank did not lack for quiet confidence or poker-faced concentration. Late in his third round, he stood over a devilish 12-footer on No. 16 when the siren of a passing police car blared. In cold blood, he sank the birdie putt.

From July 2003 Rick Telander piece:
By the end, after hitting a 3-wood to within 30 feet of the pin on his last hole, the 562-yard No. 9, Woods nearly sank another eagle putt. Oh, did I forget? Tiger had an eagle way back on his second hole, just to set the tone.

From close to April 2006 Martin Fennelly column:
On the 18th hole, he sank his 15-footer and embraced Kyle. He stuffed the ball in his pocket. It'll go in his den in Abilene, near the ball he used to finish the Masters he won. Charles Coody fumbled for his epitaph.

From the close of a June 2004 Mike Vaccaro column:
Only, that Phil Mickelson is gone. He was dissolved on April 11, the day he sank a birdie putt, felt the ground rumble under his feet, heard a roar that seized Augusta National and spilled over its ivy-covered walls, into living rooms and grille rooms all across America.

Go ahead and shoot off e-mails to Posnanski, Deford, Plaschke, Shaw, Whicker, Shipnuck and Mell to let them know they could have done it better. Because, you know, these guys don't really concentrate on their leads and neither Fennelly nor Vaccaro can close a column without just throwing something together.

Stick it, Jagoff.
 
LazyReporter said:
I am very concerned when a so-called journalist tells me to get over my "little rules" about proper usage and grammar. Those "little rules" are essential tools of our trade.

I am very, very concerned when a so-called journalist says "it doesn't need to be defined specifically" to make it so. Something that is not defined specifically has little use in journalism.

I am also extremely concerned when a so-called journalist gets their facts from a post on SportsJournalists.com, so here is the enlightenment for which you asked: http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/set

I think you will find that Merriam-Webster (or any other dictionary) offers a much more complete definition than fishwrapper's post. And just so there's no confusion, it's definition number 6a under the intransitive verb entry.

But thanks for letting me off the hook.

Your "make a basket" example is irrelevant because, according to Merriam Webster, you can make a basket. See definition 3b here: http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/basket

You are correct when you say my "little brain can't fathom the point" you are making because you haven't yet made a point that is valid. I contend that the phrase "sank a putt" is grammatically incorrect. Please enlighten me as to how that phrase is grammatically correct.

Dear LazyReporter,
I appreciate your concern for all of humanity and journalism
I can also sympathize that you woke up with that searing poker situated between the lateral and collateral gluteus.
But, the aforementioned definition of "set" was taken directly from Merriam-Webster.
Did you think I was citing Wikipedia or Urban Dictionary?
 
By the way, it's my impression that dictionaries have been adding words and definitions of existing words just about annually.

I take it that is because the usage and meaning of words evolve and change.

Not because Daniel Webster just forgot to add them in the first place and they are playing ketchup.
 
BlondeBomber,

Thanks for your demonstration of the ability to use Lexis-Nexis and giving me examples of how the phrase was used in print.

Now please provide something that shows it is grammatically correct. Appearing in print does not make it so. [That's for you, Buck]. Grammatically incorrect phrases seep into our work all the time: "Brett Favre was intercepted four times" is one commonly-used example that comes to mind.

And I never made a bad-ass edict. I answered the original question in this post by saying "When in doubt, use 'made.' It's more grammatically correct, anyway."

It was just an answer to a question that might help someone when writing a golf story in the future. You're struggling with whether to use sank or sunk, then you think "Hey, I can use 'made' instead. It's more grammatically correct, anyway."
 
LazyReporter said:
You're struggling with whether to use sank or sunk, then you think "Hey, I can use 'made' instead. It's more grammatically correct, anyway."

Yeah, but what if you're on a shipping beat?
 
Mighty_Wingman said:
LazyReporter said:
You're struggling with whether to use sank or sunk, then you think "Hey, I can use 'made' instead. It's more grammatically correct, anyway."

Yeah, but what if you're on a shipping beat?

I guess you're sunk.
 
fishwrapper said:
LazyReporter said:
I am very concerned when a so-called journalist tells me to get over my "little rules" about proper usage and grammar. Those "little rules" are essential tools of our trade.

I am very, very concerned when a so-called journalist says "it doesn't need to be defined specifically" to make it so. Something that is not defined specifically has little use in journalism.

I am also extremely concerned when a so-called journalist gets their facts from a post on SportsJournalists.com, so here is the enlightenment for which you asked: http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/set

I think you will find that Merriam-Webster (or any other dictionary) offers a much more complete definition than fishwrapper's post. And just so there's no confusion, it's definition number 6a under the intransitive verb entry.

But thanks for letting me off the hook.

Your "make a basket" example is irrelevant because, according to Merriam Webster, you can make a basket. See definition 3b here: http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/basket

You are correct when you say my "little brain can't fathom the point" you are making because you haven't yet made a point that is valid. I contend that the phrase "sank a putt" is grammatically incorrect. Please enlighten me as to how that phrase is grammatically correct.

Dear LazyReporter,
I appreciate your concern for all of humanity and journalism
I can also sympathize that you woke up with that searing poker situated between the lateral and collateral gluteus.
But, the aforementioned definition of "set" was taken directly from Merriam-Webster.
Did you think I was citing Wikipedia or Urban Dictionary?

fishwrapper,

Yes, I could see that your aforementioned definition came directly from Merriam-Webster. I was pointing out that what you posted was an incomplete definition. Maybe I'm wrong, but for some reason, whenever I click on this link http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/set I see a lot of definitions that weren't included in the aforementioned definition of "set" that was taken directly from Merriam-Webster.
 
LazyReporter said:
BlondeBomber,

Thanks for your demonstration of the ability to use Lexis-Nexis and giving me examples of how the phrase was used in print.

Now please provide something that shows it is grammatically correct. Appearing in print does not make it so. [That's for you, Buck]. Grammatically incorrect phrases seep into our work all the time: "Brett Favre was intercepted four times" is one commonly-used example that comes to mind.

And I never made a bad-ass edict. I answered the original question in this post by saying "When in doubt, use 'made.' It's more grammatically correct, anyway."

It was just an answer to a question that might help someone when writing a golf story in the future. You're struggling with whether to use sank or sunk, then you think "Hey, I can use 'made' instead. It's more grammatically correct, anyway."

Dude, I'm not struggling with sink or sunk. I'm struggling to understand how someone with such limited vision would have the temerity to lay down such a stupid rule. You say you're trying to help someone write a golf story? I'd rather learn from great writers than silly rulemakers.

The word lonely didn't exist the first time Shakespeare used it. Had you been his editor, I'm sure you would have corrected him.

A putt, as a noun, isn't merely the striking of the ball. It's the entire sequence until the ball comes to a stop. I think as I proved above, many great writers would agree a golfer can sink a putt (I can't believe I'm even arguing this). Similarly, a pass isn't just the act of the ball leaving a quarterback's hand. A pass can be completed. A putt can be sank.

But I'm not going to argue with you anymore. If it makes you feel better that you won this argument, fine. I have Deford, Lebatard, Plaschke, Shaw, Telander, Fennelly, Verdi, Vaccaro, Whicker, Shipnuck and Mell on my side -- and probably any other writer of substance I might check had I not gotten bored. I can live with that.

Keep doing what you do.
 
Mighty_Wingman said:
I set 'em up, you knock 'em down. Hell of a thing.

You make a great straight man, Mighty.

By the way, judging from this thread, I am beginning to wonder whether LazyReporter is in fact a) lazy or b) a reporter.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top