YGBFKM said:
I don't want to offend anyone, but I'm probably going to. On the list of occupations in which death is part and parcel, journalism is down quite a ways. But even if you accept the idea that occasionally dealing with death in a mostly indirect manner makes journalists somehow more equipped to "step up" and "be strong" in times of crisis, what the **** is the point of that anyway in regards to the direct emotional involvement of losing a loved one? My dad is dying. As the "eloquent" one in the family, I may be asked to be involved in whatever eulogizing takes place. If that is the case, it doesn't matter one bit what I do for a living. I will lose it at some point. There will be swearing; there will be crying. Not because I'm not strong, but because I'm more human than journalist. If I get the chance to speak in front of God, friends and family and I do it without getting emotional, I would hope my dad rises up and kicks my ass for being such a heartless ****.
Been there. And your ability to put words together is going to help you more than you could imagine. Anyone else is going to have to overcome the emotions AND write and say something that's going to be heard by so many people and live on forever. Public speaking is a horrifying fear for so, so many people, and you already know how to do it. Writing, also, is a fear -- putting yourself out there for something so emotional. And then there's the process itself; for someone who doesn't write regularly, even a 500-word essay can be a daunting task and they will stare at a blank page for an hour.
So, in short, you will knock it out of the park.
I hadn't thought in the what-if terms of being in the center of a family tragedy that demanded news coverage, but yeah, when it comes down to it, I'd be the only one I trusted to speak on my family's behalf.