Reporting injuries

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

Smallpotatoes

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2002
Messages
14,979
This afternoon, I was covering a state tournament lacrosse game and I was interviewing a kid on the winning team who scored four goals. I noticed one of his hands was bandaged and he was icing it. I asked him about it and he said his thumb was broken.
When I was done talking to him, he asked me not to write about the injury and his mother also made the same request. They explained that if it was in the paper, other teams would know about it and target it.
I didn't say I'd honor their request but I didn't say I wouldn't. I did, however, point out that because we're a weekly, the story is not going to come out until after the next (and likely the final) game, so it was probably a moot point.
I realize that the potential for other teams targeting an injury based on what's in the paper might be a reasonable concern for them, but it's not really my problem. I do tend to think people worry a little much about other teams getting their scouting information from papers that are out of their circulation area, however. I don't think coaches, as part of the scouting process, make trips into rival towns to pick up copies of the local paper and they probably wouldn't learn anything they didn't already know if they were scouting the games in person.
Does anybody here think there's anything wrong with reporting injuries if it may leave an other vulnerable to further injuries or if it puts a team at a competitive disadvantage?
Also, what do you tell these people so it doesn't seem like you're caving in to them, but also not coming off as a total ****?
 
I don't think coaches, as part of the scouting process, make trips into rival towns to pick up copies of the local paper and they probably wouldn't learn anything they didn't already know if they were scouting the games in person.

No, but you better believe they are reading out-of-area stories on the internet...
 
My wrist hurts sometimes after lots of typing. And I get paper cuts pretty often. Plus, my right shoulder is higher than my left from carrying my computer bag on my shoulder.


Oh, I thought you meant injuries incurred in the process of reporting. My bad.
 
That's why you hear so much about "upper-body injuries" and "lower-body injuries" in the NHL. Teams don't want opponents to work their players over in the area of the injury. But NHL writers definitely print the specific injury if they are told and you should report the lacrosse player's injury as well.
 
I don't report the injury if it's something that could be targeted. I don't want that on my conscience. I sleep well at night this way. I have the right to report it, but I choose not to.

After the playoffs are over, etc., then you better believe I'm spilling the beans though. I think the readers are equally interested/enlightened when it comes out later. So it's all good.

Smallpotatoes, in your situation, basically the player is saying his statement about his injury is off the record. How is that different than any other kinds of info? Seems like here you shouldn't write that it's broken, since that was off the record, but could write that it was bandaged and being iced. If you chose to of course. Again, I probably wouldn't.

Side note: I was discussing an injury in an elevator with another media member, and an EMT warned me that the coach was not allowed to release medical information on a player due to federal privacy laws. Um, yeah. While legally he might be right, he's out to lunch if he thinks a player's medical history is going to stay secret.
 
Babs said:
I don't report the injury if it's something that could be targeted. I don't want that on my conscience. I sleep well at night this way. I have the right to report it, but I choose not to.

After the playoffs are over, etc., then you better believe I'm spilling the beans though. I think the readers are equally interested/enlightened when it comes out later. So it's all good.

Smallpotatoes, in your situation, basically the player is saying his statement about his injury is off the record. How is that different than any other kinds of info? Seems like here you shouldn't write that it's broken, since that was off the record, but could write that it was bandaged and being iced. If you chose to of course. Again, I probably wouldn't.

I hope you're not serious.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
I'll report - but doesnt mean the SE here won't take it out.

He was the one who refrained from putting in any mention of Podunk High's leading returning scorer getting booted off the hoops team this year. He cited "everyone already knows" as his reasoning for not printing it; when I had dozens of people in the town asking me why Juvenile Delinquent Junior hadn't been playing.

He sent a stringer to cover Podunk one night, and stringer mentioned this fact in his story, quoted the head coach and he edited from the story. Apparently the SE was in tight with this school and has yet to report a negative word or story, because he, "doesn't like to be negative".
 
Report the injury but use common sense. I wouldn't have a problem leaving out the injury if the guy continued to perform well. If he didn't then you could use it as an excuse for subpar play.
 
This came up at my shop as well. My thoughts - if you have it on a good source, run it. What the other team does is not your responsibility. Sure, they may have read your report, but you did not tell them to go for the ankle, wrist, or whatever. Not to mention, your paper may be the third or fourth source they hear it from. News travels fast in prep circles.
 
I don't report the injury if it's something that could be targeted. I don't want that on my conscience. I sleep well at night this way. I have the right to report it, but I choose not to.

After the playoffs are over, etc., then you better believe I'm spilling the beans though. I think the readers are equally interested/enlightened when it comes out later. So it's all good.

Smallpotatoes, in your situation, basically the player is saying his statement about his injury is off the record. How is that different than any other kinds of info? Seems like here you shouldn't write that it's broken, since that was off the record, but could write that it was bandaged and being iced. If you chose to of course. Again, I probably wouldn't.

Unless he specified that information was off the record before he said it, it's by all means fair game. He knew he was talking to a reporter. Sorry, but you can't say something AND THEN say it's off the record.
 
We had a wrestler this year get a concussion right before the state meet, but was cleared to compete. We wrote about it in the preview and after his first state match. We knew what was going on because we had a reporter at the district meet who saw him hit his head in the championship match. He was declared the winner because the other wrestler was disqualified for using an unsafe move.

Kid talked about the concussion after his first-round match, then claimed after his next match the following day that we put him in danger by writing about his injury. We knew what was going on, we had the facts right. I had no qualms writing about it.

About the lacrosse player _ was his hand bandaged or taped during the match? If so, opponents already know he's injured.
 
Side note: I was discussing an injury in an elevator with another media member, and an EMT warned me that the coach was not allowed to release medical information on a player due to federal privacy laws. Um, yeah. While legally he might be right, he's out to lunch if he thinks a player's medical history is going to stay secret.

I believe the EMT was referring to HIPPA laws. Every good reporter should be familiar with the HIPPA laws, and every good preps writer should be familiar with the FERPA laws.

Reporters do not have to follow these laws, just be familiar with them so you know what questions to ask a trainer/coach/doctor/administrator who is hiding behind those laws.
 
Babs said:
Side note: I was discussing an injury in an elevator with another media member, and an EMT warned me that the coach was not allowed to release medical information on a player due to federal privacy laws. Um, yeah. While legally he might be right, he's out to lunch if he thinks a player's medical history is going to stay secret.

Ahh, ****ing Hippa laws - just about the stupidest and most misinterpreted law in the history of our federal government.

Just FYI for anyone else who comes in contact with some idiot saying they can't release someone's medical condition: This is only true if the person is someone in the medical field such as a doctor, nurse, pharmacist and EMT who treated them. They all have laws governing them and penalties attached to those laws.

Can a coach, police officer, principal, reverend, parent, friend, teacher legally tell you if someone has a broken thumb, ankle or a herpes breakout on their ass? Yes. They are not bound by Hippa in any way.

I get injury information from cops all the time because most hospitals and EMS departments have taken Hippa way, way too far to the point some don't want to even give you the most general information.

EMTs can tell you a person's condition if they don't tell you the person's name, such as the guy in the car wreck today had a head injury but now treat that information like it's their bank card pin.

I remember a story not too long ago that a church would no longer tell the congregation why they were praying for so-and-so who was in the hospital and couldn't make the service today because someone invoked the Hippa card. Bull****.

As for the Paris Hilton case, the sheriff and jail was right not to release her illness because in this case it "treated" her. But I'm sure her "illness" will come to light (if it already hasn't) at some point just because the sheriff's office is running it and deputies like to yap.
 
Write-brained said:
Babs said:
Side note: I was discussing an injury in an elevator with another media member, and an EMT warned me that the coach was not allowed to release medical information on a player due to federal privacy laws. Um, yeah. While legally he might be right, he's out to lunch if he thinks a player's medical history is going to stay secret.

Ahh, ****ing Hippa laws - just about the stupidest and most misinterpreted law in the history of our federal government.

Just FYI for anyone else who comes in contact with some idiot saying they can't release someone's medical condition: This is only true if the person is someone in the medical field such as a doctor, nurse, pharmacist and EMT who treated them. They all have laws governing them and penalties attached to those laws.

Can a coach, police officer, principal, reverend, parent, friend, teacher legally tell you if someone has a broken thumb, ankle or a herpes breakout on their ass? Yes. They are not bound by Hippa in any way.

I get injury information from cops all the time because most hospitals and EMS departments have taken Hippa way, way too far to the point some don't want to even give you the most general information.

EMTs can tell you a person's condition if they don't tell you the person's name, such as the guy in the car wreck today had a head injury but now treat that information like it's their bank card pin.

I remember a story not too long ago that a church would no longer tell the congregation why they were praying for so-and-so who was in the hospital and couldn't make the service today because someone invoked the Hippa card. Bull****.

As for the Paris Hilton case, the sheriff and jail was right not to release her illness because in this case it "treated" her. But I'm sure her "illness" will come to light (if it already hasn't) at some point just because the sheriff's office is running it and deputies like to yap.
Unless a trained professional (doctor, lawyer, nurse) or the person tells you the extent of injury, tread very lightly.
 
sportshack06 said:
I'll report - but doesnt mean the SE here won't take it out.

He was the one who refrained from putting in any mention of Podunk High's leading returning scorer getting booted off the hoops team this year. He cited "everyone already knows" as his reasoning for not printing it; when I had dozens of people in the town asking me why Juvenile Delinquent Junior hadn't been playing.

He sent a stringer to cover Podunk one night, and stringer mentioned this fact in his story, quoted the head coach and he edited from the story. Apparently the SE was in tight with this school and has yet to report a negative word or story, because he, "doesn't like to be negative".

Your SE is an idiot. Someone should call him out on it one night, especially if you can catch him not editing injuries or "negative" news out of other stories.
 
boots said:
Write-brained said:
Babs said:
Side note: I was discussing an injury in an elevator with another media member, and an EMT warned me that the coach was not allowed to release medical information on a player due to federal privacy laws. Um, yeah. While legally he might be right, he's out to lunch if he thinks a player's medical history is going to stay secret.

Ahh, ****ing Hippa laws - just about the stupidest and most misinterpreted law in the history of our federal government.

Just FYI for anyone else who comes in contact with some idiot saying they can't release someone's medical condition: This is only true if the person is someone in the medical field such as a doctor, nurse, pharmacist and EMT who treated them. They all have laws governing them and penalties attached to those laws.

Can a coach, police officer, principal, reverend, parent, friend, teacher legally tell you if someone has a broken thumb, ankle or a herpes breakout on their ass? Yes. They are not bound by Hippa in any way.

I get injury information from cops all the time because most hospitals and EMS departments have taken Hippa way, way too far to the point some don't want to even give you the most general information.

EMTs can tell you a person's condition if they don't tell you the person's name, such as the guy in the car wreck today had a head injury but now treat that information like it's their bank card pin.

I remember a story not too long ago that a church would no longer tell the congregation why they were praying for so-and-so who was in the hospital and couldn't make the service today because someone invoked the Hippa card. Bull****.

As for the Paris Hilton case, the sheriff and jail was right not to release her illness because in this case it "treated" her. But I'm sure her "illness" will come to light (if it already hasn't) at some point just because the sheriff's office is running it and deputies like to yap.
Unless a trained professional (doctor, lawyer, nurse) or the person tells you the extent of injury, tread very lightly.
Whatever, Boots. ::)

No doctor, nurse or lawyer is going to give you someone's medical history unless it's OK'd by the family. Should you get confirmation if someone outside the coach or a parent tells you what the injury is? Absolutely. Just like anything else.
 
Write-brained said:
Babs said:
Side note: I was discussing an injury in an elevator with another media member, and an EMT warned me that the coach was not allowed to release medical information on a player due to federal privacy laws. Um, yeah. While legally he might be right, he's out to lunch if he thinks a player's medical history is going to stay secret.

Ahh, ****ing Hippa laws - just about the stupidest and most misinterpreted law in the history of our federal government.

Just FYI for anyone else who comes in contact with some idiot saying they can't release someone's medical condition: This is only true if the person is someone in the medical field such as a doctor, nurse, pharmacist and EMT who treated them. They all have laws governing them and penalties attached to those laws.

Can a coach, police officer, principal, reverend, parent, friend, teacher legally tell you if someone has a broken thumb, ankle or a herpes breakout on their ass? Yes. They are not bound by Hippa in any way.

I get injury information from cops all the time because most hospitals and EMS departments have taken Hippa way, way too far to the point some don't want to even give you the most general information.

EMTs can tell you a person's condition if they don't tell you the person's name, such as the guy in the car wreck today had a head injury but now treat that information like it's their bank card pin.

I remember a story not too long ago that a church would no longer tell the congregation why they were praying for so-and-so who was in the hospital and couldn't make the service today because someone invoked the Hippa card. Bull****.

As for the Paris Hilton case, the sheriff and jail was right not to release her illness because in this case it "treated" her. But I'm sure her "illness" will come to light (if it already hasn't) at some point just because the sheriff's office is running it and deputies like to yap.

Also, it is my understanding that athletes at the Division I NCAA level sign a waiver that states that their injury information can be released.
I have gotten coaches and trainers to admit that they were using HIPPA as a smokescreen, and none of the ones I talked to even really understood the rules.
 
Cadet said:
Side note: I was discussing an injury in an elevator with another media member, and an EMT warned me that the coach was not allowed to release medical information on a player due to federal privacy laws. Um, yeah. While legally he might be right, he's out to lunch if he thinks a player's medical history is going to stay secret.

I believe the EMT was referring to HIPPA laws. Every good reporter should be familiar with the HIPPA laws, and every good preps writer should be familiar with the FERPA laws.

Reporters do not have to follow these laws, just be familiar with them so you know what questions to ask a trainer/coach/doctor/administrator who is hiding behind those laws.

Apparently I am not a good high school reporter because I have no idea what FERPA is. Care to share?
 
Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act

Like HIPPA, but for educational matters involving schools at all levels. An old law, but I believe it was given additional enforcement teeth by the Bush Administration.

http://www.ed.gov/policy/gen/guid/fpco/ferpa/index.html


It means educational records (including test scores, grades, attendance information, class schedules, etc.) cannot be released by the school without written consent from the student or parent/guardian of a minor student.

Technically, if a coach tells you Johnny Jumpshot is not on the roster because he is academically ineligible, the coach is in violation of FERPA. If Johnny tells you himself, it's cool. Likewise, if the athletic director tells you Susie Swimmer is being recruited by Harvard because she got a 34 on her ACT, he's in violation of FERPA.
 
Write-brained said:
Babs said:
Side note: I was discussing an injury in an elevator with another media member, and an EMT warned me that the coach was not allowed to release medical information on a player due to federal privacy laws. Um, yeah. While legally he might be right, he's out to lunch if he thinks a player's medical history is going to stay secret.

Ahh, ****ing Hippa laws - just about the stupidest and most misinterpreted law in the history of our federal government.

Just FYI for anyone else who comes in contact with some idiot saying they can't release someone's medical condition: This is only true if the person is someone in the medical field such as a doctor, nurse, pharmacist and EMT who treated them. They all have laws governing them and penalties attached to those laws.

Can a coach, police officer, principal, reverend, parent, friend, teacher legally tell you if someone has a broken thumb, ankle or a herpes breakout on their ass? Yes. They are not bound by Hippa in any way.

I get injury information from cops all the time because most hospitals and EMS departments have taken Hippa way, way too far to the point some don't want to even give you the most general information.

EMTs can tell you a person's condition if they don't tell you the person's name, such as the guy in the car wreck today had a head injury but now treat that information like it's their bank card pin.

I remember a story not too long ago that a church would no longer tell the congregation why they were praying for so-and-so who was in the hospital and couldn't make the service today because someone invoked the Hippa card. Bull****.

As for the Paris Hilton case, the sheriff and jail was right not to release her illness because in this case it "treated" her. But I'm sure her "illness" will come to light (if it already hasn't) at some point just because the sheriff's office is running it and deputies like to yap.

babs wouldn't have run the hilton info anyway. sleeping well is a big thing with babs, you know.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top