Songbird said:But Sweet Lou is Sweet Lou. Isn't this the 3rd team he's taken to the playoffs?
Guy_Incognito said:Wow, the NL really stinks.
Dangerous_K said:Guy_Incognito said:Wow, the NL really stinks.
No.
Guy_Incognito said:Dangerous_K said:Guy_Incognito said:Wow, the NL really stinks.
No.
Which NL team is better than any of the AL playoff teams? Detroit would be the NL favorite.
buckweaver said:Dangerous_K said:Guy_Incognito said:Dangerous_K said:Guy_Incognito said:Wow, the NL really stinks.
No.
Which NL team is better than any of the AL playoff teams? Detroit would be the NL favorite.
I would imagine the Rockies might be able to stake a claim, considering they beat both the Red Sox and Yankees.
Uhh ... no.
buckweaver said:Dangerous_K said:What? The Rockies won season series with both the Red Sox and Yankees, the former on the road and the latter a sweep.
The Royals have been known to sweep the Sox and Yanks, too. Does that mean they should "be able to stake a claim" to being a better team? I don't think so.
No. If not for the Mets' collapse, his team is playing golf.
casty33 said:Rockies ... why not pick the most unlikely possibility? Besides, remember last year when the Cardinals looked like they didn't have a chance and won the Series. It could happen again. (Besides, Clint Hurdle is a good guy).
Dangerous_K said:I see what you mean, but really I haven't seen anything from the AL teams that makes me think they are THAT much better than the NL teams. The Indians lost every game they played against New York, and NY has questionable pitching. The Angels were owned by the Red Sox, and the Red Sox played horrible down the stretch. In terms of talent, yeah, those four have more. I don't know, I'm kinda posting in circles.