Pete Thamel on Dustin Johnson vs. Pete Thamel on Tyrann Mathieu

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

That's a sad existence for Josh Levin, to be that obsessed with a guy whose name wouldn't register with 0.1 percent of the public.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
That's a sad existence for Josh Levin, to be that obsessed with a guy whose name wouldn't register with 0.1 percent of the public.

"Obsessed"? Levin has a weekly sports podcast on a fairly popular website (Slate); he dedicated a few minutes during that podcast--twice over a 20-month period--to discussing a series of absurd profiles written in the country's preeminent sports magazine.
 
Some might.

Some might also look at Slate's daily offerings -- all of which carry the budget line "everybody is wrong about everything" -- and get a good laugh out of the fact that other somes consider executive editor Josh Levin to be an insightful authority on the news.
 
Some might.

Some might also look at Slate's daily offerings -- all of which carry the budget line "everybody is wrong about everything" -- and get a good laugh out of the fact that other somes consider executive editor Josh Levin to be an insightful authority on the news.
Some might.

Some might also look at Slate's daily offerings -- all of which carry the budget line "everybody is wrong about everything" -- and get a good laugh out of the fact that other somes consider executive editor Josh Levin to be an insightful authority on the news.

Yeah, they should take a cue from a beacon of journalistic excellent like Pete Thamel, and instead write about dead people that don't exist:

http://deadspin.com/5976841/how-sports-illustrateds-manti-teo-story-got-published
 
I can't tell if your hard-on originates from love of Levin or hate of Thamel. Probably the latter.
 
Reads like a hit job to me.

By the originator of this thread.

Listen to the first podcast cited and let me know if you think it was fair. Then we can debate which was a bigger "hit job": a story about a college kid in national sports publication read by hundreds of thousands of people, or my post about a professional journalist on a message board read by a few hundred.
 
I could give a **** what Thamel did or didn't write or say. And you may or may not see that you come off as somebody with a personal axe to grind.
 
I could give a **** what Thamel did or didn't write or say. And you may or may not see that you come off as somebody with a personal axe to grind.

Sorry for trying to discuss journalism on a journalism message board. Why'd you open the thread if you "could give a **** what Thamel did or didn't write or say"? I don't know Thamel and don't have any personal axe to grind.
 
Forgive me but who is Josh Levin? It seems like a daunting task to listen to his 90 minute podcast to even understand his point. For the record I've been a big fan of thamels college sports work since his days at NYT.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top