henryhecht said:
frank, you're posing an either/or situation
it's a false choice
you can do breaking news and long-range enterprise and they should co-exist peacefully, each enhancing the other
But it rarely works that way. Nowadays the centerpiece is unlikely to be breaking news. The news gets shoved into a corner. This is the tail wagging the dog.
henryhecht said:
and why belittle the awards? aren't they chosen by diligent thoughtful people? and don't they reward a high standard of journalism? sure, you can quibble about what is great, good and mediocre, but they get it right most of the time
Because they are useless to our mission of attracting readers, but we overemphasize them because, in absence of increased sales, which we seem to find impossible to accomplish, awards have become our tangible measure of success because we know how to win them. When APSE broke it down to four circulation brackets, I knew things were only going to get worse. In the largest bracket, roughly 50 percent of the papers will win a section award. This is becoming like the Special Olympics, a medal for everyone! Maybe if we ceased this annual exercise in patting ourselves on the back, we could focus on attracting readers.
My comments were in response to Editude's claim that Orlando has been fixated on awards. I don't know if that's true in Orlando, but it is true a lot of places.
In a previous job I was the Sunday SE and I made some big changes. A key figure in APSE, a guy I've known for 25 years now, told me that these changes would hurt us in the contest. As it turned out, we still made Top 20, but my response to him was, "I do not care about the contest. We are in a competitive situation here, and I care about having a section that is more useful to readers than the other paper's is."