SF_Express
Active Member
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2003
- Messages
- 9,166
My bill says my newspaper subscription ends today, and although the carrier might be slow on the uptake by a few days, I have to assume I'll stop getting a daily paper delivered for the first time in many years soon.
I'm struggling with this. I'm a newspaper guy, despite my job of the past 14 years. And I use the paper for Facebook critiques that a few people find amusing.
I always try to make these critiques more about management calls than anything personal, although I suppose since managers are people, they're personal to them.
But Tribune Co. policies and specifically how they relate to my local paper have ground me down. My business section on any given day might include more stories from the neighboring county than they do from mine (this is not rare), and same with the local section.
And because they're trying to "program" two sports sections for the price of one, there are days where the decisions are incomprehensible.
For example, this Tribune paper put every single game of the World Series on an inside page. Every one. Best World Series in years. Some days, they didn't even bother with the photo/tease. 5C, 7C, whatever.
Thursday night, the Blackhawks visited the Panthers. They advanced the game on 1C, because of a lot of connections now here came from the Blackhawks.
Game story: 5C. A shootout loss for a team that's 6-4-2 that they ADVANCED ON 1C, if I didn't make that clear.
This is all about section decisions being made remotely; not wanting to tear up inside pages; modules; production efficiency; corporate chaos ... and I understand the problems they're having. But it's not about putting out a good paper.
So unless they call and say, "We'll cut the re-up cost in half," I'm making the very sad decision to drop my daily paper. When I separated, my kids started me on that subscription because they couldn't seem me living without the paper every day. I doubt they'll bat an eye this time.
But I can't keep validating a crappy product, so without some serious cost-to-me concessions on the paper's part, the end of an era is likely
I'm struggling with this. I'm a newspaper guy, despite my job of the past 14 years. And I use the paper for Facebook critiques that a few people find amusing.
I always try to make these critiques more about management calls than anything personal, although I suppose since managers are people, they're personal to them.
But Tribune Co. policies and specifically how they relate to my local paper have ground me down. My business section on any given day might include more stories from the neighboring county than they do from mine (this is not rare), and same with the local section.
And because they're trying to "program" two sports sections for the price of one, there are days where the decisions are incomprehensible.
For example, this Tribune paper put every single game of the World Series on an inside page. Every one. Best World Series in years. Some days, they didn't even bother with the photo/tease. 5C, 7C, whatever.
Thursday night, the Blackhawks visited the Panthers. They advanced the game on 1C, because of a lot of connections now here came from the Blackhawks.
Game story: 5C. A shootout loss for a team that's 6-4-2 that they ADVANCED ON 1C, if I didn't make that clear.
This is all about section decisions being made remotely; not wanting to tear up inside pages; modules; production efficiency; corporate chaos ... and I understand the problems they're having. But it's not about putting out a good paper.
So unless they call and say, "We'll cut the re-up cost in half," I'm making the very sad decision to drop my daily paper. When I separated, my kids started me on that subscription because they couldn't seem me living without the paper every day. I doubt they'll bat an eye this time.
But I can't keep validating a crappy product, so without some serious cost-to-me concessions on the paper's part, the end of an era is likely