Mr. Rove? Your Subpoena's Ready.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fenian_Bastard
  • Start date Start date
Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

F

Fenian_Bastard

Guest
Pull one thread, and it all unravels.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/28/us/28alabama.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
 
Since none of Fenian's friends/identities/voices in his head will post, I'll help him out.

Beat_Dead_Horse.jpg
 
BigDog said:
Since none of Fenian's friends/identities/voices in his head will post, I'll help him out.

Beat_Dead_Horse.jpg

Why is that air traffic controller holding a light sabre?
 
If you were hitting a horse with a light saber, you'd be carving him, rather than beating him, methinks.
 
Yes, because we should all stop thinking about the politicization of the federal criminal justice system and go back to thinking up sexist drivel about Christine Brennan.
You can **** off now, thanks.
 
Fenian_Bastard said:
Yes, because we should all stop thinking about the politicization of the federal criminal justice system and go back to thinking up sexist drivel about Christine Brennan.
You can **** off now, thanks.

Show me the drivel about Christine Brennan. Tell me what it was. I'd love to hear this.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
Mr. Rove is quite capable of defending himself, methinks.

Not that I won't eventually look forward to seeing him try.
 
slappy4428 said:
Ace said:
If you were hitting a horse with a light saber, you'd be carving him, rather than beating him, methinks.
Thank you Obi-****ing-Wan Kenobi


Han sliced open that Tauntaun with Luke's lightsaber, so I win the argument!
 
Fenian_Bastard said:
Yes, because we should all stop thinking about the politicization of the federal criminal justice system and go back to thinking up sexist drivel about Christine Brennan.
You can **** off now, thanks.

FB, I say this as someone who has come to grudgingly respect your passion and persistence - You do not want to stake your reputation on Don Siegleman's honesty.
 
dixiehack said:
Fenian_Bastard said:
Yes, because we should all stop thinking about the politicization of the federal criminal justice system and go back to thinking up sexist drivel about Christine Brennan.
You can **** off now, thanks.

FB, I say this as someone who has come to grudgingly respect your passion and persistence - You do not want to stake your reputation on Don Siegleman's honesty.

Oh, in this case, which is the only thing under discussion -- if he knocked over a fruit stand once in Guntersville, that's another matter -- I do.
This was a loaded political prosecution, start to finish, and more than a few people are going to get roasted over it. There's already sworn testimony to that effect. This is the thread that unravels it all.
 
Wasn't this the case that caused a flap a couple weeks back?
60 Minutes was doing a story on this, and the CBS station in Huntsville went black while it aired and then the technical problems were fixed when the report was done.
Is that how that went?

It also seems like one of the prosecutors went on the record or in sworn testimony and said the White House was calling the shots on this deal.
 
Rove, of course, will just laugh off the subpoena, citing "executive privilege" since he was presumably working on the instructions of Shrubby.

A tried-and-true strategy straight from Darth Cheney, who learned it from his mentor, the Sith Master, Darth Milhous.
 
Starman said:
Rove, of course, will just laugh off the subpoena, citing "executive privilege" since he was presumably working on the instructions of Shrubby.

A tried-and-true strategy straight from Darth Cheney, who learned it from his mentor, the Sith Master, Darth Milhous.

Oh now I get that photo:

BigDog said:
 
Segelman looks like he could be Rupert Murdochs brother.

Any word on Jim Guy Tucker?
 
Why drag Jim Guy into it?
He was a sworn political enemy of the Clintons and had to resign his governship because he was prosecuted and convicted of something that wasn't a crime when he did it.
But Starr got a scalp so none of that mattered.
 
As someone who has broken bread with Don Siegelman on more than one occasion and actually likes Don Siegelman the person (not Don Siegelman the politician) - dixiehack could not be more accurate than he was in his earlier post.
 
Dan Abrams was all over this tonight.
The prosecution stank from day one.
The 11th circuit did everything but nail a copy of its ruling to the prosecutor's forehead.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top