If you combined this Simmons piece (http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=simmons/061103) with this Neel column (http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=neel/071126&sportCat=nba) in the Ronco Column Recycler it might generate a replica of today's Jemele Hill offering (http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=hill/071226&sportCat=nba). Glue the "hated rivals are good" rhetoric from the Simmons piece onto Neel's anti-Celtic stuff and, presto bango, we've got a new column.
I realize there's only so many original column ideas out there and its easy to inadvertantly duplicate others, but this umpteenth version of the "why sports hatred is healthy" theme struck me as particularly derivative--where it felt like I'd read the same column dressed in different clothes a half-dozen times before. Is there any point where that stuff starts to cross ethical lines?
I realize there's only so many original column ideas out there and its easy to inadvertantly duplicate others, but this umpteenth version of the "why sports hatred is healthy" theme struck me as particularly derivative--where it felt like I'd read the same column dressed in different clothes a half-dozen times before. Is there any point where that stuff starts to cross ethical lines?