outofplace said:Buck said:thebiglead said:Drew Brees? 0-2
Philip Rivers? 1-1 (has looked awful both games, albeit against v good defenses)
Eli Manning? 0-2 (hurt or not, RB or not, he's has yet to prove he's a franchise QB)
Marc Bulger? 0-2 (Kurt Warner, except he doesn't win)
* It could also be argued that McNabb has weaker WR/TE than all of the above QBs, except maybe Brees.
Just one man's opinion - feel McNabb's HBO comments are accurate. McNabb seems to be getting blasted harder today than any of the above, all of whom have sucked equally or worse this season.
Are we talking about team record or individual performance? The Giants are 0-2, but in Week 1 Manning was 28-for-41 passing for 312 yards with four touchdowns and one interception. That's a 113 rating.
Even with the injury, Manning's rating after two weeks is 97.5.
Manning's performance has been an issue many times in the previous two years. So far this season, he's not to blame for the 0-2 record.
That's at least two on your list whose teams are losing in spite of them, not because of them, biglead.
I don't think Rivers entered the season with expectations anywhere near the rest of that list. He's just a good young quarterback on a team with high expectations. He has also faced two of the league's better defenses.
Brees is the only one who is actually a fair comparison. Can't speak to his performance so far because I haven't seen them play yet. I saw McNabb looking shaky last night, I'm sure because of the knee.
Rivers?
He was annointed as the next Fran Tarkenton in what amounted to his first big start, against Pittsburgh on Monday Night last year.
He was sharing the field with Roethlisberger, who'd only just won the Super Bowl, and the crew was acting as if Rivers had reinvented the game.