Golfweek Fires Editor

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

Joined
Jul 21, 2006
Messages
194
Did anyone else see where Golfweek fired the editor who came up with the idea for the noose cover? Amazing, but NOT surprising. What's other's thoughts?
 
Just one firing? Hell, the whole company usually signs off on a cover.
 
Didn't see that. Who was the editor? And unless he pushed it through against everyone's objections, I don't see how it's one person's fault, though I guess the top dog gets the blame.
 
Dave Seanor.

http://www.golf.com/golf/tours_news/article/0,28136,1704872,00.html
 
Don't mag covers get approved by those at the top of the masthead, including the publisher?

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/19/sports/golf/19magazine.html

Golfweek magazine, which published a cover with a noose set against a purplish sky to illustrate its coverage of a controversial comment about Tiger Woods, announced Friday that it had fired Dave Seanor, the editor who approved the cover.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
The idea that anybody OK'd that is beyond me. It's unfortunate that only one person took the fall, but at least one person did.
 
Oh, well, congrats to new editor Jeff Babineau, I guess.
 
Did everyone miss the memo? Journalism is dead. If you write something advertisers don't like, you either fire the people responsible or they pull their advertising. My favorite quote is Finchem saying that Golfweek is attempting to inflame a situation that is coming to a "proper conclusion." Says who...I don't think it's come to that conclusion. When dies Finchem get fired for allowing The Golf Channel to hire Tighlman?
 
This will only continue because Tiger plays next week at Torrey Pines ... and Tilghman returns to the booth for the tournament.
 
GolfWeek is a shill. That's the problem.
This is a news reactionary cover over the Kelly Tilghman comment. She kept her job.
We can argue the level of execution or concept or taste. What's not in question is the newsworthiness.
To think Dave Seanor made that decision in a vacuum is naive.
 
"Our wish is that one regretful error does not erase more than 30 years of service we've dedicated to this industry."

Errors are accidental. This cover was intentional.

And as I said on the other thread, when I told my wife that he had been "replaced", she asked "What about the other 5-6 people who were in the room and did not have the balls to stand up and do the right thing?"
 
http://www.sportsjournalists.com/forum/threads/51442/
(though I wouldn't call it a d_b)

How about this quote from the Times story:

Seanor said on Thursday that his intention was not to be “racially provocative,” but to illustrate a noose tightening around Tilghman, the Golf Channel and golf. He said: “There weren’t a lot of other ideas for the cover; either you put Kelly out there or this image, which is emblematic of what this controversy is about.”

Talk about not saying much for this guy's editing skills or his coworkers'. The ONLY choices for this were Tilghman and a noose?
 
fishwrapper said:
To think Dave Seanor made that decision in a vacuum is naive.

And that's my problem with this. The art director and the publisher were in on it, too, and they get off scot-free.
 
playthrough said:
http://www.sportsjournalists.com/forum/threads/51442/
(though I wouldn't call it a d_b)

How about this quote from the Times story:

Seanor said on Thursday that his intention was not to be “racially provocative,” but to illustrate a noose tightening around Tilghman, the Golf Channel and golf. He said: “There weren’t a lot of other ideas for the cover; either you put Kelly out there or this image, which is emblematic of what this controversy is about.”

Talk about not saying much for this guy's editing skills or his coworkers'. The ONLY choices for this were Tilghman and a noose?

Or Tilghman in a noose.
 
What about Al Sharpton and a noose on the cover of lily-white Golfweek?
 
Not surprising, in the butt-kissing golf-corporate America nexus.
To me, it was one of those classic '60s George Lois Esquire covers. I'd probably have OKed it too.
May Dave Seanor quickly find more lucrative work.
 
Let's be honest about this. He wasn't fired because of racially offensive imagery. He was fired because Golfweek is a glorified p.r. vehicle, and the higher-ups were terrified that this might prevent the tour from bringing this "unfortunate situation" to a tidy conclusion.

He got fired for attempting journalism at a place where that concept was foreign.

I wish him the best.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top