Gold Cup: USA 2, Canada 1

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

BigDog

Active Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2002
Messages
2,966
A complete domination by the American side. Canada claimed to have the equalizer in stoppage time, but two players were clearly offside on the play -- which came shortly after Michael Bradley was sent off on a horrid call. (And, sensing that SJ.ca will argue that ESPN says they weren't offside, here's how the WWL is wrong, again.)

"A player in an offside position is penalized if, at the moment the ball touches or is played by one of his team, he is, in the opinion of the referee, involved in active play by interfering with play, interfering with an opponent or gaining an advantage by being in that position."

Suck failure.

But here's some progress for the Canuckles, who dipped to 0-7-6 against Team USA since 1985: They scored against the US for the first time in their last seven matches.
 
And amazingly enough, 98 percent of the population of Canada didn't give a ****.
 
Oh, I'd say if the score was reversed, some would have been sprinting to their keyboard.
 
From what I saw on the replay . . . . . I thought he was onside by a half step.

I've only seen it once, and reserve the right to see it again and change my story. But right now, I think the call was bogus.
 
Lots of people play soccer in Canada. Quite a few of us, as Flash points out, don't really care and wouldn't even if Canada had won this game. Personally, I would have thought, "oh, that's nice," if I had bothered to think anything at all about it.

My reaction might have been a tiny bit stronger if Canada had managed to beat an actual soccer powerhouse or even a country where soccer matters more than it does here - the USA fails on both counts.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
My reaction might have been a tiny bit stronger if Canada had managed to beat an actual soccer powerhouse or even a country where soccer matters more than it does here - the USA fails on both counts.

When on earth would Canada ever play a "powerhouse" in a game that counts for something? They can't even make it through CONCACAF qualifying to play big boy soccer. Losing in Gold Cup semis is the best they can do.

Suck it, Canada.
 
Hey, we just jumped 38 spots to 70th (!) in the FIFA World Soccer Rankings.

Tied with Venezuela.

Let's map out the parade route.
 

The M.Bradley red card was the right call. The second he went down for the slide and brought his leg, and studs, up, he was getting sent off.

Canada was actually one of the better teams in this tournament. Mexico has the history but they havn't been playing well enough. Canada gave the US a game towards the end (more so than it should have been) but this happens sometimes.

Hume, the Canadian striker brought on late, essentially scored two goals for Canada. He put one in on the US and he saved the Dempsey header while on the goal line.

The final offsides call was also correct. The ball came off of Onyewu. When Onyewu touched it, both Canadians were offsides.

It wasn't a bad game at all. The US should have put in some better players, but I'm thinking that Bradley wanted to save them for the Final against Mexico on Sunday. Here's hoping for another 2-0 US victory!
 
Pastor, I think the call was right, but it doesn't matter where Hutchinson was standing when Onyewu headed the ball. It matters where they were when the Canadian tried a long shot/pass. It seemed Hutchinson was barely offside at that time.

Bradley's red card was deserved. Reckless tackle. Hejduk's yellow card was not warrented, and DeRosario should have been sent off for the head butt.

Canada wasn't bad. But I felt the US defense was horrible. Just horrible.
 
Big Buckin' agate_monkey said:
Where is Sunday's final?

Same field as last night: Soldier Field, Chicago. It is listed as already being sold out.
 

Huggy, I don't recall if Canada won the Gold Cup before. But, prior to this year, the Gold Cup was fairly meaningless. With the new rules in place, the winner of this tournament goes on to represent the conference in the Confederations Cup.

In previous years, the US used the tournament as a means to test out new talent and see who they had. This year, they actually took it somewhat seriously.

Big Buckin' agate_monkey said:
Pastor said:
Big Buckin' agate_monkey said:
Where is Sunday's final?

Same field as last night: Soldier Field, Chicago. It is listed as already being sold out.


Son of beech!


Sorry, BBAM, you should have seen this one coming. They laid the tournament out so that the Yanks would play the Tri in the finale.

I would suggest you take a look at Sam's Army's website. They don't have anything listed for the game, but anything is possible. I would highly suggest getting in touch with someone there to see if you can get it.
 
Hammer Pants said:
I'm sure "sold out" means "stands full of red, green and white," correct?
The stands will have far more green than red and white.
More sloppy defending at the end of the game. BB might want to get that issue straightened out.
FWIW, it looked like the two were even. And how big would Donovan's miss looked then?
 
My god can you at least look at this objectively. The Americans did desreve the final result but that was not offside. Look at the replay he is clearly even with the last defender.
 
Not bad for the northern neighbors considering how hard it is to play soccer in skates....
 
BigDog said:
A complete domination by the American side. Canada claimed to have the equalizer in stoppage time, but two players were clearly offside on the play -- which came shortly after Michael Bradley was sent off on a horrid call. (And, sensing that SJ.ca will argue that ESPN says they weren't offside, here's how the WWL is wrong, again.)

"A player in an offside position is penalized if, at the moment the ball touches or is played by one of his team, he is, in the opinion of the referee, involved in active play by interfering with play, interfering with an opponent or gaining an advantage by being in that position."

Just watched the goal again: There's no way in hell Hutchinson was offside. When the ball was played in from the midfield, Hutchinson was a good step behind the last U.S. defender. The only man to touch the ball until Hutchinson got it was Onyewu. He's onside. The only way he wouldn't have been is if the Canadian right next to Onyewu had also gotten his head on the ball. Looks like he missed it.

And the Bradley tackle was an obvious red card, too. (No, I'm not Canadian.)
 

Latest posts

Back
Top