Double Down
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2002
- Messages
- 14,349
This is from last week's New Yorker, but it's worth reading. You can throw the standard lazy response and say "stupid liberal New Yorker bias!" but only, I think, if you don't read the story. It is conservatives making this claim, not liberals. They're essentially saying what we've been talking about here for the last few months: modern conservatisism needs a total overall. That isn't to say modern liberalism doesn't have its own problems. But it makes the interesting point that one of the reasons why McCain got the nomination this year is because, right now, he's the only conservative who can win. The strategy of dividing up America into 51-49 and playing to people's anger seems to have run its course. Nixon's strategy of demonizing the left isn't going to be a winner forever. A lot of conservatives want to remake the party because they fear there is going to be a real cultural shift, and if they continue to beat the same drum, they'll be left behind, just like the left was after McGovern.
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2008/05/26/080526fa_fact_packer/?currentPage=all
Really interesting stuff. If you're on the right and you want to slam Packer, you're kind of missing the point. It's guys like David Brooks, David Frum, Newt Gingrich, etc., making this point the loudest.
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2008/05/26/080526fa_fact_packer/?currentPage=all
Really interesting stuff. If you're on the right and you want to slam Packer, you're kind of missing the point. It's guys like David Brooks, David Frum, Newt Gingrich, etc., making this point the loudest.