Fox drops the ball

[dooley_womack1]

Outing alert: Fishhack2009 is really Brett Favre.

He changed his answer in that post. A lot.

I think we have a new winner in the "this post has all the intelligence of a baked potato" contest....

Yes, yes. Facts suck. I'm dumb. Just call me Fox News.

Lighten up, Francis...

I hate getting involved in this crap, but...what does that even mean? You avoid the tough questions. You just repeat a bunch of stuff over and over again and refuse to actually engage in real debate. You know why you started this thread. You knew your agenda from the beginning. You never actually had a point. You just wanted to start a fight. Reminds me of watching BYH.

Too easy.

 

[fishhack2009]

Outing alert: Fishhack2009 is really Brett Favre.

He changed his answer in that post. A lot.

I think we have a new winner in the "this post has all the intelligence of a baked potato" contest....

Yes, yes. Facts suck. I'm dumb. Just call me Fox News.

Lighten up, Francis...

I hate getting involved in this crap, but...what does that even mean? You avoid the tough questions. You just repeat a bunch of stuff over and over again and refuse to actually engage in real debate. You know why you started this thread. You knew your agenda from the beginning. You never actually had a point. You just wanted to start a fight. Reminds me of watching Sean Hannity.

Sheesh. Again, lighten up. If you can't have a civil discussion or take a joke, then take a hike. I explained why I started the thread. If you choose not to take me at my word, then fine. I really don't give a **** why you think I started the thread. Move on.

 

[YGBFKM]

Sheesh. Again, lighten up. If you can't have a civil discussion or take a joke, then take a hike. I explained why I started the thread. If you choose not to take me at my word, then fine. I really don't give a **** why you think I started the thread. Move on.

Lighten up, dickbag.

 

[fishhack2009]

Sheesh. Again, lighten up. If you can't have a civil discussion or take a joke, then take a hike. I explained why I started the thread. If you choose not to take me at my word, then fine. I really don't give a **** why you think I started the thread. Move on.

Lighten up, dickbag.

Right on cue.

 

[Care Bear]

How was my post not civil? Because I invoked Hannity?

Your explanation sucked. And reeked of bull****. And you know it. Which is why I'm still wasting my time here.

You're right, I should move on, and I will. This is not worth it. But you have been so disingenuous on this thread. And I'm gonna call you on that. You have to have a point, man. You have to be able to defend it. This was a bull**** thread, based on your first post. You played it wrong.

And I'm going to try and figure out a way to take a joke. I suck at humor.

And nothing personal, honestly. I just don't like the way you approached any of this.

I'm trying to be fair and balanced.

 

[fishhack2009]

How was my post not civil? Because I invoked Hannity?

Your explanation sucked. And reeked of bull****. And you know it. Which is why I'm still wasting my time here.

You're right, I should move on, and I will. This is not worth it. But you have been so disingenuous on this thread. And I'm gonna call you on that. You have to have a point, man. You have to be able to defend it. This was a bull**** thread, based on your first post. You played it wrong.

And I'm going to try and figure out a way to take a joke. I suck at humor.

And nothing personal, honestly. I just don't like the way you approached any of this.

I'm trying to be fair and balanced.

Fair enough.

Once again: I asked a question. You questioned my motives for asking it, and the way I asked it. That's fine. I'm a big boy. Let's agree to disagree, okay? One person's bull**** is another person's legitimate argument. I respect your opinion. Respect mine, and we're good.

Take care, and have a good night.

 

[dooley_womack1]

How was my post not civil? Because I invoked Hannity?

Your explanation sucked. And reeked of bull****. And you know it. Which is why I'm still wasting my time here.

You're right, I should move on, and I will. This is not worth it. But you have been so disingenuous on this thread. And I'm gonna call you on that. You have to have a point, man. You have to be able to defend it. This was a bull**** thread, based on your first post. You played it wrong.

And I'm going to try and figure out a way to take a joke. I suck at humor.

And nothing personal, honestly. I just don't like the way you approached any of this.

I'm trying to be fair and balanced.

Care Bear posts; you decide.

 

[Care Bear]

How was my post not civil? Because I invoked Hannity?

Your explanation sucked. And reeked of bull****. And you know it. Which is why I'm still wasting my time here.

You're right, I should move on, and I will. This is not worth it. But you have been so disingenuous on this thread. And I'm gonna call you on that. You have to have a point, man. You have to be able to defend it. This was a bull**** thread, based on your first post. You played it wrong.

And I'm going to try and figure out a way to take a joke. I suck at humor.

And nothing personal, honestly. I just don't like the way you approached any of this.

I'm trying to be fair and balanced.

Fair enough.

Once again: I asked a question. You questioned my motives for asking it, and the way I asked it. That's fine. I'm a big boy. Let's agree to disagree, okay? One person's bull**** is another person's legitimate argument. I respect your opinion. Respect mine, and we're good.

Take care, and have a good night.

As you said, fair enough. Have a good night, too. I still want to meet this "Francis."

 

[fishhack2009]

How was my post not civil? Because I invoked Hannity?

Your explanation sucked. And reeked of bull****. And you know it. Which is why I'm still wasting my time here.

You're right, I should move on, and I will. This is not worth it. But you have been so disingenuous on this thread. And I'm gonna call you on that. You have to have a point, man. You have to be able to defend it. This was a bull**** thread, based on your first post. You played it wrong.

And I'm going to try and figure out a way to take a joke. I suck at humor.

And nothing personal, honestly. I just don't like the way you approached any of this.

I'm trying to be fair and balanced.

Fair enough.

Once again: I asked a question. You questioned my motives for asking it, and the way I asked it. That's fine. I'm a big boy. Let's agree to disagree, okay? One person's bull**** is another person's legitimate argument. I respect your opinion. Respect mine, and we're good.

Take care, and have a good night.

As you said, fair enough. Have a good night, too. I still want to meet this "Francis."

It's a "Stripes" reference. One of the best unintentionally funny characters in the movie...

 

[YGBFKM]

 

[fishhack2009]

"I catch any of you guys in my stuff, I'll kill ya."

Epic part of the movie.

It kind of lost steam after boot camp graduation, though.

 

[farmerjerome]

As a (drunk) bleeding heart liberal I was actually offended that Olberman went after the Right in one of his Haiti broadcasts. Seriously? Focus on the topic at hand and leave the Righties alone. Please people, just raise awareness for people who have waaaaaay leessssssss than we have right now. Including wine.

 

[GlenQuagmire]

FOX News: O'Reilly, Beck, Palin, Hume.

MSNBC: Olbermann, Maddow, Matthews.

Both sides have their "agendas." Personally, I think O'Reilly and Beck ask important questions that others fail to raise in many cases. Both can be too much to handle sometimes.

Honestly, I'd like to see more focus on the issues and fewer pissing contests between both sides.

 

[Double J]

As a (drunk) bleeding heart liberal.....

And no corresponding "ask drunk farmerjerome" thread? Fail!

 

[Paper Guy]

shouldnt this really be on the poly board? i mean, we all know its going to turn into a pissing match...

If we still had one, perhaps ...

wow...didnt even notice it had been closed...i used to go over there now and then, but it was too painful to watch...hope the mods dont let this board get that far too :\

 

[Trouser_Buddah]

Outing alert: Fishhack2009 is really Brett Favre.

He changed his answer in that post. A lot.

I think we have a new winner in the "this post has all the intelligence of a baked potato" contest....

Yes, yes. Facts suck. I'm dumb. Just call me Fox News.

Lighten up, Francis...

I hate getting involved in this crap, but...what does that even mean? You avoid the tough questions. You just repeat a bunch of stuff over and over again and refuse to actually engage in real debate. You know why you started this thread. You knew your agenda from the beginning. You never actually had a point. You just wanted to start a fight. Reminds me of watching Sean Hannity.

Sheesh. Again, lighten up. If you can't have a civil discussion or take a joke, then take a hike. I explained why I started the thread. If you choose not to take me at my word, then fine. I really don't give a **** why you think I started the thread. Move on.

Outing alert: Fishhack is Todd Donoho.

 

[MrBSquared]

Fishhack reminds me of this lawyer friend of mine. He "tweets" all day about how wrong and how much he hates conservatives -- because they are so intolerant.

Hello, pot -- meet kettle ...

 

[fishhack2009]

Fishhack reminds me of this lawyer friend of mine. He "tweets" all day about how wrong and how much he hates conservatives -- because they are so intolerant.

Hello, pot -- meet kettle ...

Gee, that was original.

Actually, I'm got plenty of conservative friends. We agree to disagree and still go out for wings.

Don't let get facts in the way of easy assumptions, however.

 

[joe_schmoe]

Fishhack reminds me of this lawyer friend of mine. He "tweets" all day about how wrong and how much he hates conservatives -- because they are so intolerant.

Hello, pot -- meet kettle ...

That's about right.
From reading the post it's goes along with similar third-grade antics Fish has displayed here. Say something. When proven wrong, or come to the realization no one agrees with you, including those who should, you call your friend ugly or say you were joking ("this is why I started the thread (not your reason)", "lighten up Francis").

 

[Hackwilson191]

FOX News: O'Reilly, Beck, Palin, Hume.

MSNBC: Olbermann, Maddow, Matthews.

Both sides have their "agendas." Personally, I think O'Reilly and Beck ask important questions that others fail to raise in many cases. Both can be too much to handle sometimes.

Honestly, I'd like to see more focus on the issues and fewer pissing contests between both sides.

Maybe we should just stick to CNN then ....