O
Omar_dont_scare
Guest
So Arkansas is all a-quiver about this story where a fan filed an FOI for Houston Nutt's cell phone records, then forwarded his findings onto the board of trustees.
Juicy stuff abounds within. Good, meaty tabloid-type fodder.
Apparently, Arkansas paid the phone bill, thus the records were accessible. Now all those bills are going to a foundation loosely affiliated with the university, but as a "private" organization, not accessible under an FOI.
A few questions
1) If a university could do this with coaches' phone records, what would prevent a government from doing the same with phones owned by employees?
2) How many people in other places are going to follow suit?
3) Is this OK for a journalist? I mean, if you're investigating a particular story, that's one thing. But just to file an FOI them for the sake of doing so to see what dirt you can expose... I don't know, it seems like an unnecessary invasion of privacy.
Thoughts?
Juicy stuff abounds within. Good, meaty tabloid-type fodder.
Apparently, Arkansas paid the phone bill, thus the records were accessible. Now all those bills are going to a foundation loosely affiliated with the university, but as a "private" organization, not accessible under an FOI.
A few questions
1) If a university could do this with coaches' phone records, what would prevent a government from doing the same with phones owned by employees?
2) How many people in other places are going to follow suit?
3) Is this OK for a journalist? I mean, if you're investigating a particular story, that's one thing. But just to file an FOI them for the sake of doing so to see what dirt you can expose... I don't know, it seems like an unnecessary invasion of privacy.
Thoughts?