Boys and Girls, The Future of Newspapers

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

fishwrapper

Active Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2006
Messages
4,106
City & State/Province
West of the Mississippi
Mix in a color LCD screen. A lower price to reach more readers.
And you got it.
Shorter stories. Quick-hit news.
No more longballs. Narratives and the written feature are for magazines.

kindle.jpg


http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000FI73MA/ref=amb_link_6055642_1?pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_s=center-2&pf_rd_r=0C8PNWW13HGSXX667T6J&pf_rd_t=101&pf_rd_p=340036301&pf_rd_i=507846
 
yawn

why have one of those when you have one of these?

iphone_34.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
no, i'm not missing the point -- digital readers have been around for a while, with downloadable content. just because its branded by amazon doesn't kill the newspaper. the cell phone and distribution through cell phones and devices like the iphone and blackberry are much more part of the future than amazon's 1996 machine
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
I didn't say it would kill newspapers. Those were your words.
You're stuck on the gadget. The immediate technology. The interest is the merger of content and platform and technology. Specifically original content.
The New York Times and Washington Post seem to thing "amazon's 1996 machine" is worthwhile. They're providers of the content.
 
fishwrapper said:
I didn't say it would kill newspapers. Those were your words.
You're stuck on the gadget. The immediate technology. The interest is the merger of content and platform and technology. Specifically original content.
The New York Times and Washington Post seem to thing "amazon's 1996 machine" is worthwhile. They're providers of the content.

The thing is, the merger already exists, content-wise anyway -- I read L.A. Times and WaPo stories on my phone all the time. I get AP feeds from Google. All formatted for a cell-phone screen (after about a year of trial-and-error, anyway.)

The next step is for every daily newspaper in the country to give you that kind of formatted, real-time access to their content on the gadgets people use -- which won't be the Kindle, I'm betting.
 
It won't be Kindle. Of course not. It will be the phone or whatever the utilitarian device it is in five years.
Associated Press feeds are not the unique content that will save your career. I'm not sure if I can stress that enough. The Google feeds? Will kill careers (mine too) faster than save.
Your chains. Your papers will need the avenue to deliver the content.
Without that technology. Without that ambition. Well, you see my point.
That's the discussion that's worthwhile. Not the microchip.
 
I was thinking about dropping $400 on the 16GB iTouch. After reading about the Kindle, I'm definitely buying the iTouch.
 
fishwrapper said:
It won't be Kindle. Of course not. It will be the phone or whatever the utilitarian device it is in five years.
Associated Press feeds are not the unique content that will save your career. I'm not sure if I can stress that enough. The Google feeds? Will kill your careers (mine too) faster than save.
Your chains. Your papers will need the avenue to deliver the content.
Without that technology. Without that ambition. Well, you see my point.
That's the discussion that's worthwhile. Not the microchip.

Exactly. The problem, of course, is that newspaper companies have to invest in the product in order to provide that content to enter-futuristic-utilitarian-PDA-device here.

And they need to do it quick, because as a consumer, I can already get unique content from the LAT, NYT, WaPo, etc. If the Gannetts and McClatchys and other chains that own newspapers don't catch up, then keep up ... :-\
 

Latest posts

Back
Top