Owner of the OC Register lays out the plan and reasons to paper's subscribers:
http://www.ocregister.com/articles/free-502166-digital-register.html
http://www.ocregister.com/articles/free-502166-digital-register.html
slappy4428 said:Not even a five-article tickle...
IHateSpringSports2013 said:slappy4428 said:Not even a five-article tickle...
I think it's probably a better strategy to do 5-10 articles per month free...obviously people should have to pay for EVERYTHING because it costs a lot of money to pay people (I mean, pay people the same money to write for online and print, thus doubling their work with no raise), but I really think that 5-10 article per month free is needed, just for realistic point of view.
Versatile said:IHateSpringSports2013 said:slappy4428 said:Not even a five-article tickle...
I think it's probably a better strategy to do 5-10 articles per month free...obviously people should have to pay for EVERYTHING because it costs a lot of money to pay people (I mean, pay people the same money to write for online and print, thus doubling their work with no raise), but I really think that 5-10 article per month free is needed, just for realistic point of view.
Every limited paywall I've ever seen can be averted easily, hell, almost accidentally, often by something as simple as clearing cookies.
Good for the Register. I worry it won't work with the Los Angeles Times still free.
Versatile said:IHateSpringSports2013 said:slappy4428 said:Not even a five-article tickle...
I think it's probably a better strategy to do 5-10 articles per month free...obviously people should have to pay for EVERYTHING because it costs a lot of money to pay people (I mean, pay people the same money to write for online and print, thus doubling their work with no raise), but I really think that 5-10 article per month free is needed, just for realistic point of view.
Every limited paywall I've ever seen can be averted easily, hell, almost accidentally, often by something as simple as clearing cookies.
Good for the Register. I worry it won't work with the Los Angeles Times still free.
SnarkShark said:The San Francisco Chronicle also installed a paywall recently.
It may work, I guess, but it's about 10 years too late for this. If this would have been the standard on internet news from the beginning, instead of giving content away online for free, we might be looking at a considerably different climate at newspapers.
As usual, too little, too late.