typewriterhill
Member
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2007
- Messages
- 676
You know what is real sad, there's more sad commentary about this horse dying than that of Andre Waters.
andyouare? said:This past Kentucky Derby was the first I ever watched. A friend, a big fan, had a big party, complete with friendly wages, the singing of some song (I forget) and, yes, mint juleps. It was a great time and I remember thinking, "hey, horse racing is kind of cool."
After watching what happened to Barbaro, suffice it to say it will be the last horse race I watch. Sad, sad, sad.
typewriterhill said:You know what is real sad, there's more sad commentary about this horse dying than that of Andre Waters.
Runaway Jim said:A couple things:
1. **** off, Idaho.
2. I'm glad the horse isn't suffering anymore. It seemed like it was time. The vets did everything they could, and I'm glad they didn't let the horse suffer anymore.
3. Those who accuse the owners of being greedy need to understand two things: 1.) They could have cashed in on the insurance right away if they'd put him down at the track, and 2.) I may be wrong here, but I don't think thoroughbred racing allows horses to be bred with artificial insemination -- so anyone who thinks they kept him alive solely for future stud fees is incorrect.
3. Because it bears repeating: **** off, Idaho.
markvid said:F_H, you do raise a very good point there, however, was it good for him to be the guinea pig when most owners would never be able to afford this kind of care?Freelance Hack said:shockey said:r.i.p., barbaro.
i'm not a horse-racing guy. those who are, could you please answer me this: did the owners/docs do right by this splendid animal by giving him every chance? or were they just being cruel and greedy to make him go through all this? ??? ??? ???
IMO, if they were greedy, they would have just cashed the insurance policy and euthanized him at Pimlico.
As I said, Barbaro was a pioneer in the medical field for horses. Very few medical pioneers lead long lives, yet they help future patients recover from devastating injuries.
Who knows? In 10 years, superstar horses may never be destroyed if they severely break a leg. If that's the case, then it's a credit to Barbaro and his owners.
Runaway Jim said:A couple things:
1. **** off, Idaho.
2. I'm glad the horse isn't suffering anymore. It seemed like it was time. The vets did everything they could, and I'm glad they didn't let the horse suffer anymore.
3. Those who accuse the owners of being greedy need to understand two things: 1.) They could have cashed in on the insurance right away if they'd put him down at the track, and 2.) I may be wrong here, but I don't think thoroughbred racing allows horses to be bred with artificial insemination -- so anyone who thinks they kept him alive solely for future stud fees is incorrect.
3. Because it bears repeating: **** off, Idaho.
Flying Headbutt said:Runaway Jim said:A couple things:
1. **** off, Idaho.
2. I'm glad the horse isn't suffering anymore. It seemed like it was time. The vets did everything they could, and I'm glad they didn't let the horse suffer anymore.
3. Those who accuse the owners of being greedy need to understand two things: 1.) They could have cashed in on the insurance right away if they'd put him down at the track, and 2.) I may be wrong here, but I don't think thoroughbred racing allows horses to be bred with artificial insemination -- so anyone who thinks they kept him alive solely for future stud fees is incorrect.
3. Because it bears repeating: **** off, Idaho.
And Dickface, you **** off. Idaho didn't even post on here. It's a ****ing horse. And wasn't even your horse. Wasn't your pet. You didn't get a pony ride from Barbaro on your birthday. Grow up.
Flying Headbutt said:People, it is a horse. And Idaho isn't the only one who has a hard time figuring out the breathless coverage of this animal.
Flying Headbutt said:Runaway Jim said:A couple things:
1. **** off, Idaho.
2. I'm glad the horse isn't suffering anymore. It seemed like it was time. The vets did everything they could, and I'm glad they didn't let the horse suffer anymore.
3. Those who accuse the owners of being greedy need to understand two things: 1.) They could have cashed in on the insurance right away if they'd put him down at the track, and 2.) I may be wrong here, but I don't think thoroughbred racing allows horses to be bred with artificial insemination -- so anyone who thinks they kept him alive solely for future stud fees is incorrect.
3. Because it bears repeating: **** off, Idaho.
And Dickface, you **** off. Idaho didn't even post on here. It's a ****ing horse. And wasn't even your horse. Wasn't your pet. You didn't get a pony ride from Barbaro on your birthday. Grow up.
Runaway Jim said:A couple things:
1. **** off, Idaho.
2. I'm glad the horse isn't suffering anymore. It seemed like it was time. The vets did everything they could, and I'm glad they didn't let the horse suffer anymore.
3. Those who accuse the owners of being greedy need to understand two things: 1.) They could have cashed in on the insurance right away if they'd put him down at the track, and 2.) I may be wrong here, but I don't think thoroughbred racing allows horses to be bred with artificial insemination -- so anyone who thinks they kept him alive solely for future stud fees is incorrect.
3. Because it bears repeating: **** off, Idaho.
Zeke12 said:Actually shot, one of the best things about this place -- not the best thing, mind you, but one of the good things -- is that anyone can tell anyone to **** off.
KnowwhatI'msayin'?
Zeke12 said:Actually shot, one of the best things about this place -- not the best thing, mind you, but one of the good things -- is that anyone can tell anyone to **** off.
KnowwhatI'msayin'?