Running 2026 Golf Thread

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

For a good time, go look up the Pat Perez story involving Phil.

Dept. of Meaningless Information: Pat Perez and his dad, Tony Perez, are estranged. Hate each other. I have met Tony and talked with him a little bit. A friend knows him quite well and donates to Wounded Warriors, which Tony is affiliated with. There are three country clubs next to each other, even sharing the same fences -- Fairbanks Ranch, La Valle Coastal Club (formerly Morgan Run) and The Farms. The Farms is the one Mickelson was run from. Tony helps run a fundraising tournament for Wounded Warriors at Fairbanks Ranch. A lot of people go from club to club on the Rancho Santa Fe Cocktail Circuit.
 

That definitely reads like "concepts of a plan." No way the Masters suddenly agrees to 120 players plus former winners, amateurs and selected other tours. No way the PGA Championship doesn't include their 20 club pros. No way the U.S. Open doesn't have qualifying to fill out their spots. And the Open has to just be laughing at this proposal.

And I love the "well, we'll haven't really worked out medical exemptions, past winners and everything else but this is the definitive answer to what we probably will change multiple times between now and 2028 because sponsors and lawyers and charities are calling right now to sue us."

I'm fascinated by the idea of adding "major metropolitan areas" as well. Is Akron considered a major metropolitan area? How about Moline? Or Monterey? Or Greensboro? Good thing they dropped the Greenbrier Classic, because White Sulphur Springs isn't much more than a wide spot in the road.

More NASCAR-ification of a sport that should realize how badly NASCAR has run itself into the ground.
 
Last edited:
On a very quick look, I don’t see a lot that will make me want to watch more events than I already watch. The majors. The Players. A few others. My sports default when nothing else is on.

One thing I do like very much: Making the Tour Championship match play and moving it around to other courses.
 
That definitely reads like "concepts of a plan." No way the Masters suddenly agrees to 120 players plus former winners, amateurs and selected other tours. No way the PGA Championship doesn't include their 20 club pros. No way the U.S. Open doesn't have qualifying to fill out their spots. And the Open has to just be laughing at this proposal.

And I love the "well, we'll haven't really worked out medical exemptions, past winners and everything else but this is the definitive answer to what we probably will change multiple times between now and 2028 because sponsors and lawyers and charities are calling right now to sue us."

I'm fascinated by the idea of adding "major metropolitan areas" as well. Is Akron considered a major metropolitan area? How about Moline? Or Monterey? Or Greensboro? Good thing they dropped the Greenbrier Classic, because White Sulphur Springs isn't much more than a wide spot in the road.

More NASCAR-ification of a sport that should realize how badly NASCAR has run itself into the ground.

The majors aren't run by the PGA Tour, so those are clear exempts from this new mish-mash they are trying to do.
 
That definitely reads like "concepts of a plan." No way the Masters suddenly agrees to 120 players plus former winners, amateurs and selected other tours. No way the PGA Championship doesn't include their 20 club pros. No way the U.S. Open doesn't have qualifying to fill out their spots. And the Open has to just be laughing at this proposal.

And I love the "well, we'll haven't really worked out medical exemptions, past winners and everything else but this is the definitive answer to what we probably will change multiple times between now and 2028 because sponsors and lawyers and charities are calling right now to sue us."

I'm fascinated by the idea of adding "major metropolitan areas" as well. Is Akron considered a major metropolitan area? How about Moline? Or Monterey? Or Greensboro? Good thing they dropped the Greenbrier Classic, because White Sulphur Springs isn't much more than a wide spot in the road.

More NASCAR-ification of a sport that should realize how badly NASCAR has run itself into the ground.
You've pointed out the essential structural weakness of the Tour in professional golf. It controls NONE of the four most (five most if you include the Ryder Cup) prestigious and coincidentally most lucrative for players tournaments on its schedule. IF sufficiently annoyed, Augusta National, the USGA, the R&A, and the PGA of America have enough experience, personnel, and wealth to start a competing tour, which wouldn't be the joke LIV is/was.
 
That definitely reads like "concepts of a plan." No way the Masters suddenly agrees to 120 players plus former winners, amateurs and selected other tours. No way the PGA Championship doesn't include their 20 club pros. No way the U.S. Open doesn't have qualifying to fill out their spots. And the Open has to just be laughing at this proposal.

And I love the "well, we'll haven't really worked out medical exemptions, past winners and everything else but this is the definitive answer to what we probably will change multiple times between now and 2028 because sponsors and lawyers and charities are calling right now to sue us."

I'm fascinated by the idea of adding "major metropolitan areas" as well. Is Akron considered a major metropolitan area? How about Moline? Or Monterey? Or Greensboro? Good thing they dropped the Greenbrier Classic, because White Sulphur Springs isn't much more than a wide spot in the road.

More NASCAR-ification of a sport that should realize how badly NASCAR has run itself into the ground.
Bingo.

Can't wait to see how the green jackets of Augusta are going to just leap at this. And, as maumann pointed out, the R&A has to be rolling on the floor in massive laughter.
 
Again, the majors are not coming along with this because they are not PGA Tour events.
 
I could see the PGA of America going along after it gets its spots for the club pros, which is the one thing that has made this one what it is (other than "the fourth major").

Maybe the USGA plays ball to some extent. But Augusta and the R&A? Yeah ... good luck with those.
 
No, the USGA will not play along. It prides itself on hosting the US Open where anyone in the country* can theoretically qualify. It's not giving that up.

*-with a Handicap Index of 1.2 or less.
 
That definitely reads like "concepts of a plan." No way the Masters suddenly agrees to 120 players plus former winners, amateurs and selected other tours. No way the PGA Championship doesn't include their 20 club pros. No way the U.S. Open doesn't have qualifying to fill out their spots. And the Open has to just be laughing at this proposal.

And I love the "well, we'll haven't really worked out medical exemptions, past winners and everything else but this is the definitive answer to what we probably will change multiple times between now and 2028 because sponsors and lawyers and charities are calling right now to sue us."

I'm fascinated by the idea of adding "major metropolitan areas" as well. Is Akron considered a major metropolitan area? How about Moline? Or Monterey? Or Greensboro? Good thing they dropped the Greenbrier Classic, because White Sulphur Springs isn't much more than a wide spot in the road.

More NASCAR-ification of a sport that should realize how badly NASCAR has run itself into the ground.
The majors won't be subject to the Tour's criteria for the Championship Series. Rolapp made it a point to say that those tournaments will carry on with their usual requirements for entry.
 
Here's the one thing not addressed in the "new" structure: the glacial pace of play. On Sunday, it took the final pair over an hour to play 2 1/2 holes.

Yeah, it's the U.S. Open. Yeah, there's a big check and immortality on the line. Yeah, Clark had a clear rules situation on No. 16 which necessitated all the rigamole of declaring, dropping twice, clearing the lie and then placing it basically on a tuft of grass in the middle of the rough. And then taking a couple of minutes to discuss everything.

But if there's a sport that needs a shot clock now, it's professional golf. Football has it. Basketball has it. Baseball has it.

There's no reason players and caddies can't be discussing the possible options while walking to the ball or waiting for their turn on the next tee. I'm gobsmacked by how long it takes for two or three players, men and women, to clear the mechanism and hit a ball. Rounds at the Greater Metro Car Dealers Closed should not be taking five to six hours, let alone at Augusta or Shinnecock Hills.

One, it's terrible television. Two it's terrible for the people on public courses who think they need to go through a two-minute pre-shot/pre-putt routine, only to dribble it 25 years down the fairway or whack it into a hazard. Or four-jack from 12 feet while plumb bobbing and finger reading because Joe Pro does it.

Forty five seconds from the time the caddie drops the bag to the follow-through, a minute tops. If they need the yardage, give them real-time access to the data that I can see on my laptop. That's enough time to choose a club, determine the wind direction, pick a landing spot and make some practice swings. Then hit the damn ball.

Same thing with putts. Once you mark your ball, two minutes to walk and judge the speed and distance before you make your first strike, no more than a minute to clean up the miss.

The clock should reset when the group reaches the tee and is cleared to hit and then for each player. The clock should reset when the group reaches the first player's ball (and exceptions made for lost ball or rules questions) and then for each player. The clock should reset when the green in front of them is cleared for approach shots. The clock should reset when everyone has reached the putting surface and all balls are marked, and then for each putt.

If the timer runs out before you advance the ball, that's a penalty of one stroke added to your score on that hole.

Somebody has to be able to design a lightweight, battery/solar operated two-sided shot clock on a pole that can be carried with each group, set in an obvious but inobtrusive place near the golfer and caddie to be able to determine how much time they have remaining to hit. And there need to be 18 rules officials, one assigned to every hole so decisions can be made quickly and keep play moving. I actually like the idea of the gallery counting down the seconds like in an NBA or college basketball arena. You want pressure? Let the clock get down to single digits.

I don't care about strolling from green to the next tee or down the fairways, or the eventual backups in play. That's OK and unavoidable, given the course. But there's no reason the PGA and LPGA tours can't play a modified version of "ready golf" instead of whatever slog we're watching right now.
 
Last edited:
If I’m right in my assumption that Track 2 events have no top-100 players, I wish nothing but the best of luck to the good folks trying to sell tickets and/or hospitality packages.
 
You've pointed out the essential structural weakness of the Tour in professional golf. It controls NONE of the four most (five most if you include the Ryder Cup) prestigious and coincidentally most lucrative for players tournaments on its schedule. IF sufficiently annoyed, Augusta National, the USGA, the R&A, and the PGA of America have enough experience, personnel, and wealth to start a competing tour, which wouldn't be the joke LIV is/was.
I think the Greencoats are sufficiently annoyed at the lack of movement by the rest of the governing bodies in the distance issue and wouldn't be surprised if they launch a Masters-specific tournament ball in the next couple years. That issue intrigues me a lot more than how the PGA Tour is reshuffling its chairs.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top