1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Yates not guilty

Discussion in 'Anything goes' started by DyePack, Jul 26, 2006.

  1. DyePack

    DyePack New Member

    http://www.cnn.com/2006/LAW/07/26/yates.trial.ap/index.html?section=cnn_topstories
     
  2. Freelance Hack

    Freelance Hack Active Member

    How in the hell does this happen in Texas?

    California, I can understand, but not in Hang'em-High-Happy-Land.
     
  3. Freelance Hack

    Freelance Hack Active Member

    Andrea "c'mon kids it's bath time" Yates
     
  4. WHA73

    WHA73 Guest



    Fucking unreal..stone the bitch
    Attorney George Parnham "She's no longer a danger to anyone" WTF
     
  5. Armchair_QB

    Armchair_QB Well-Known Member

    So no longer being a danger means you shouldn't be punished for killing your children?

    Can we stone him too?
     
  6. Ace

    Ace Well-Known Member

    If she is not guilty by reason of insanity (which very well may be appropriate) they should charge the husband with reckless endangerment or something for leaving the kids with her.
     
  7. WHA73

    WHA73 Guest

    Parnham "she now has the opportunity to bond with the memories of her children" good lord, blow me dickwad
     
  8. WHA73

    WHA73 Guest

    I'm close to losing the beans and dogs I had for lunch listening to this Parnham asshole
     
  9. Armchair_QB

    Armchair_QB Well-Known Member

    Wonder how long it'll be before she sits down with Bahbwa Wahtwahs.
     
  10. Chef

    Chef Active Member

    Unbelievable.
     
  11. Mystery_Meat

    Mystery_Meat Guest

    [​IMG]
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page