Worst weekly article ever?

Nicely played.

Even though I'm not that far from Buffalo, I'd never heard of this paper. I wish it had stayed that way ...

 

Maybe the bookie is just as stupid as the guy who wrote this blog and doesn't charge any juice.

 

There's a guy in Eastern North Carolina that I could totally see writing this column, outside of the hooters references, because of the tone, language, etc.... So that made this even funnier for me.

 

Just one guy? Shoot, I can think of more than that. ;D

 

I actually felt my brow ridge getting lower and jutting out while reading that. Then, I nearly tripped over my knuckles when I got up from the chair.

I'm suddenly hankering for a bronto burger

 

Actually, you have to hit about 52.5 percent to break even with a 10 percent vig. For example, if you made 100 $100 wagers and hit 53 percent, you would profit $130. $5300 in wins, $5170 in losses.

 

I laughed at this for a solid 10 minutes.

 

for the love of christ did i ever laugh 'til i cried when i read that.

 

Well, I'll give this sexist moron one thing: He's found a good way to make sure NO parent asks him to write a story about their son or daughter. Would you want him writing about how your daughters' hooters bounce as she rounds the bases?

 

Thanks for explaining that to me. I always assumed 60 percent was the over/under.

 

Man. Here's to hoping he actually DOES show up for the women's game and all the players are waiting to stomp on his back with their cleats.

 

And do NOT let Flash read this thread.