1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Why Scoop's Vegas Column TRUMPS Whitlock's

Discussion in 'Journalism topics only' started by Sportsbruh, Feb 21, 2007.

  1. Sportsbruh

    Sportsbruh Member

    See for yourself.

    Scoop column: http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=jackson/070219

    Whitlocks column: http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansascity/sports/columnists/jason_whitlock/16730767.htm


    It's clear Scoop was rubbing shoulders with the Movers and Shakers, whereas Whitlock was babysitting old college buddies.

    Not only that, but Scoop was a well sought after fella - who was OVER BOOKED, whereas Whitlock was waiting in lines with the commoners.

    Who am I to judge - read for yourself.
     
  2. Clever username

    Clever username Active Member

    Re: Why Scoops Vegas Column TRUMPS Whitlock's

    Scoop's, jackass, Scoop's. Not Scoops. The rest of your nonsense isn't even worth derision.
     
  3. fishwrapper

    fishwrapper Active Member

    Re: Why Scoops Vegas Column TRUMPS Whitlock's

    Balderdash. Name-dropping balderdash.
     
  4. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

    Re: Why Scoops Vegas Column TRUMPS Whitlock's

    Why didn't Scoop know there was an ESPN party at the Wynn?
     
  5. Flying Headbutt

    Flying Headbutt Moderator Staff Member

    Re: Why Scoops Vegas Column TRUMPS Whitlock's

    What's a Scoop column doing on the Journalism Board?
     
  6. Sportsbruh

    Sportsbruh Member

    Overbooked!

    They knew it. They REALLY didn't want to disturb him.
     
  7. people around here like to use the term "thanks for checking in (fill in writer here)..." But since Scoop actually posted that thing himself, I can't even make the joke.


    Speaking of jokes, fo shizzle is that some drizzle. I hope he wore knee pads.
     
  8. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

    Or he wasn't important enough to garner an invite.
     
  9. Oz

    Oz Active Member

    Do we really need a thread for every time Whitlock and Scoop might cross paths? Can't we just have a running thread ... one that Whitlock and Sportsbruh could have all to themselves? Would anyone be opposed to this?
     
  10. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

    Running Sportbruh Bojangling Thread?

    aka

    More Flavor Flav, Less Chuck D. Thread
     
  11. Sportsbruh

    Sportsbruh Member

    Come to think of it, you might be right.

    BTW: Who else from ESPN was sought after to host events of prominence other than Stu Scott?

    BOUNCE: hater - you looking bad. That yellow in your avatar becomes you.
     
  12. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

    If he was so sought after, why didn't ESPN invite him to the party? Wouldn't they have wanted Scoop there?

    Or, maybe, they didn't care about having him there because he's just a .com writer and host of a crappy reality series devoted to playing video games.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page