1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Whitlock on Nebraska-Ball State game

Discussion in 'Journalism topics only' started by Jeremy Goodwin, Sep 23, 2007.

  1. Jeremy Goodwin

    Jeremy Goodwin Active Member

    I thought he'd be at the game, but wasn't sure if he'd write anything about it. Bold lead. I know fans can overreact, but I don't know about calling for Callahan's head if Nebraska lost. He had special access and mentioned it, but didn't brag about it or make himself the story because of the special access.

    Your thoughts / comments?

    http://www.kansascity.com/sports/columnists/jason_whitlock/story/287147.html

    JASON WHITLOCK COMMENTARY
    COMMENTARY
    Whitlock: Ball State was the better team against Nebraska
    JASON WHITLOCK COMMENTARY

    LINCOLN, Neb. | A dropped pass that caused heartache I won’t soon forget in all likelihood saved Bill Callahan’s job on Saturday.

    Hmm — one man’s despair is another man’s salvation.

    With fewer than 30 seconds left in this weekend’s most exciting game, Ball State receiver Dante Love flashed across the Nebraska 10-yard line wide open on a post pattern. Quarterback Nate Davis read the Cornhuskers’ blitz and whistled the ball right into the chest of his best receiver, a kid who had tortured the Nebraska secondary for 10 catches, 214 yards and one TD.

    The ball bounced off Love’s shoulder pads and fell harmlessly to the ground, ending my alma mater’s fairy-tale upset bid and prolonging Nebraska’s uneasy marriage to coach Callahan.

    Nebraska 41, Ball State 40.

    Oh, my Cardinals ran one more offensive play and tried a desperation 55-yard field goal with a freshman kicker, but Love’s drop was the final error that broke the Cardinals’ back.

    The kick had no real chance, and a heroic effort by a mid-major that has legitimate aspirations of being the next Boise State came up one play short against a BCS giant still reeling from Tom Osborne’s retirement and a premature decision to fire Frank Solich.

    The football gods are unfair. Callahan gets an undeserved victory, avoids calls for his immediate dismissal, and my Ball State Cardinals are denied their first-ever victory over a BCS foe.

    I traveled to Lincoln for fun and to anoint Ball State tight end Darius Hill as my Jeff George replacement — the super-talented hometown football star that I’ll spend the next 15 years championing. Hill made his bones at Blue Springs High School as a 6-foot-6, skinny football-basketball combo. He’s now 6-6, 240 pounds and, according to NFL draft guru Mel Kiper, Hill is the fourth-best tight end prospect in the 2009 draft.

    But I’ll now have to save Hill’s story for another day. I never imagined that the Cardinals and the Cornhuskers would stage such a dramatic shootout. Sure, I fantasized about a Ball State upset, what it would feel like, what I would do in its aftermath. In fact, the night before the game, I addressed the team and told them why we could beat the Huskers.

    However, I made no preparations for this, an amazing, scary, breathtaking roller-coaster ride that ended with a trap door stealing every ounce of joy.

    It’s worth repeating: Being a fan is far more difficult than being a sports writer.

    When Love burst open at the 10 and Davis flicked a perfect spiral, I felt like it was the payoff for more than two decades of longing for my program to hit the real big time. Yeah, a year ago we went into Michigan’s Big House and received a lot of attention for losing by eight points.

    I’m not into moral victories.

    Saturday, we outplayed the Cornhuskers. We rolled up 610 yards of offense compared to Nebraska’s 552. We had more first downs (27-25). We outgained Nebraska on the ground (200-137). We won the turnover battle (3-2). We made Nebraska fans boo the Blackshirts inside Memorial Stadium.

    Nate Davis, our sophomore QB, was clearly the best football player on the field. He threw for 422 yards and three TDs. Had Love held onto two long throws in the first half, Davis would’ve thrown for 500 yards.

    I’m sure Nebraska fans are wondering how it happened. I’m sure they think it was all a fluke, a product of the Huskers taking Ball State lightly.

    Nope. Davis is for real. He’s potentially the best player the Mid-American Conference has seen since Randy Moss played for Marshall. And Davis has a strong supporting cast, including Hill, a veteran offensive line with two potential pros at the tackle spots, Love, a second tight end, Madaris Grant, and an offensive coordinator, Stan Parrish, with tremendous experience at the professional and collegiate levels.

    Parrish had Tom Brady when they both were at Michigan. Parrish was the Tampa Bay Buccaneers’ quarterbacks coach the year the Bucs won the Super Bowl. Obviously, Kansas State fans know that Parrish has head-coaching experience.

    Nebraska caught Ball State on the wrong Saturday. The Cardinals are young — the entire offense will return next season — and maturing. They’re just realizing how good they are and how to finish games.

    Head coach Brady Hoke did a marvelous job preparing his team mentally for Saturday’s game. I sat through the team meetings Friday night, sat in the locker room before the game, at halftime and following the devastating loss. His message throughout was that Ball State had the better team.

    He won’t find any disagreement in Nebraska this week. He’d probably find football fans there wondering what it would take to get him and Nate Davis to Lincoln in time for the 2008 season.
     
  2. Umm,

    shouldn't it be "less than 30 seconds left"?
     
  3. Chi City 81

    Chi City 81 Guest

    Callahan just signed a new five-year deal two weeks ago. Way to work those corners with facts, Jason. ::)

    Also, he wasn't in the press box or the dining room, so Lord knows from where he watched the game.
     
  4. Jeremy Goodwin

    Jeremy Goodwin Active Member

    Certainly doesn't like he was in the press box. I'm guessing on the sidelines the whole game...

    He was probably there as a fanboy and was called by Fannin, Lawton or the Sunday editor to write something.
     
  5. Elliotte Friedman

    Elliotte Friedman Moderator Staff Member

    "We?"

    Oy vey.
     
  6. sportschick

    sportschick Active Member

    Well, he did play for them, so in this case, it doesn't bother me . . . much.
     
  7. dooley_womack1

    dooley_womack1 Well-Known Member

    I'm no Whitlock fan, but I liked the column as something a little different, the perspective from a fanboy who can write.
     
  8. Chi City 81

    Chi City 81 Guest

    How is that description any different from Simmons?
     
  9. dooley_womack1

    dooley_womack1 Well-Known Member

    There's no basis for discussion, in my book, if you see Whitlock and Simmons being in any way. shape or form comparable in quality.
     
  10. linotype

    linotype Well-Known Member

    Quite frankly, I'm more bothered by Whitlock addressing the team the night before.
     
  11. Hammer Pants

    Hammer Pants Active Member

    He did play for them.

    That, in my opinion, is the only acceptable time to say "we," assuming you hardly every cover that team.
     
  12. spnited

    spnited Active Member

    If anyone other than Whitlock wrote this graf, we'd be calling him a hack:


    The football gods are unfair. Callahan gets an undeserved victory, avoids calls for his immediate dismissal, and my Ball State Cardinals are denied their first-ever victory over a BCS foe.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page