What's happening to that "consensus" on global warming?

Ragu -- You go on thinking you won that chat about the Canadian health-care system if it gets you through the night. You asserted without evidence for the better part of the day, and he kept replying with a) a whole bunch of facts that he learned first-hand, and b) compelling anecdotal evidence that you were wrong. Yelling "insupportable" isn't good enough.
Anyway, back on topic. I think we now know where o_t got his "news tip."

http://mediamatters.org/items/200712220003

 

Remain calm. All is well.

 

Do I need to cut and paste each and every one of then for you Fenian? You and Zeke pick three or four guys out of more than 400 and claim they have no credibility while they have just as much or more credibility than the "experts" you drool all over because they say things you agree with.

I know it's tough for you because Media Matters hasn't told you what to say yet, so I would advise you to just be patient until they do.

 

Well done.

 

Hey, Fenian, my grandparents were cow-calf folks. I come by it honest.

 

Don't worry about us. We're good.

 

Oh, and Tony, the whole premise makes it a fraud.

The TV weather guy. From Kentucky. ON HIS BLOG!

Well, that was just icing on the cake.

 

But you're willing to eat up anything from the TV weather guys who says global warming is real and classify them as experts in your "consensus" bullshit. So one guy makes a list of more than 400 invalid? Shows you don't want to admit you've been had.

 

I ran this through Dooleyfish and it came back as:

Guh.

 

The only thing this post shows is that subject-verb agreement still eludes you.