1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

What would happen if Americans stopped smoking?

Discussion in 'Anything goes' started by MisterCreosote, Sep 19, 2011.

  1. Uncle.Ruckus

    Uncle.Ruckus Guest

    Unfortunate skydiving accident?
     
  2. outofplace

    outofplace Well-Known Member

    Depends if you consider dying from a disease caused by your smoking "going out naturally" or not.
     
  3. Uncle.Ruckus

    Uncle.Ruckus Guest

    Maybe she intends to get eaten by lions. Ever think of that?
     
  4. imjustagirl

    imjustagirl Active Member

    I do. And I'm not.
     
  5. Uncle.Ruckus

    Uncle.Ruckus Guest

    Hey, if every smoker and soft-drink drinker signs a pledge to be eaten by lions by their 50th birthday, I'd be all for giving them a waiver on these sin taxes. Otherwise, pony up, fuckers.
     
  6. Uncle.Ruckus

    Uncle.Ruckus Guest

    Painless? What are you, a liberal?
     
  7. Point of Order

    Point of Order Active Member

    First they come for your smokes and soft drinks. Then they come for your soul.
     
  8. imjustagirl

    imjustagirl Active Member

    HA! Joke's on them, then!
     
  9. jackfinarelli

    jackfinarelli Well-Known Member


    And the book was even better than the movie...
     
  10. jackfinarelli

    jackfinarelli Well-Known Member


    The recipients of that philanthropy are probably impressed. Remember, in order for those folks to give $18M a year to charity, there have to be charitable organizations willing to take the money...
     
  11. outofplace

    outofplace Well-Known Member

    Careful you don't dislocate your shoulder with that reach. Got one actual example of a charity refusing their money? You might find a few, but I'm guessing the real limit is how much they want to give. They do enough to try to clean up their image, but not much compared to what the industry makes.
     
  12. jackfinarelli

    jackfinarelli Well-Known Member


    My point was that the charitable organizations that took the reported $18M per year had to be sufficiently appreciative of the money to take it - - or they would have rejected it. I am sure that some charities do not take "tobacco money"; I would suspect that the American Lung Association would not take money from the Marlboro Man but I don't know that for sure.

    Giving to charity is done for lots of reasons - - only one of which is to gain favorable recognition within a community. I think it is quite a stretch for anyone to judge the motivation(s) of any donor and an even bigger stretch to suppose that someone can determine how much a donor ought to give to charities.

    According to this report tobacco companies give $18M a year to charities. That is a good thing. It does not justify the tobacco industry but it is still a good thing. Presumably, the charities did positive things with the money...
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page