Week 13 NFL thread

3 Octave, the National Football League itself sure seems to think Suh's a dirty player, based on the amount and number of fines he's been assessed.

 

What purpose does it serve bringing this up?
"Ndamukong Suh and the Lions are dirty" ==> shallow football analysis.
I understand that's the outer limit of tools like LongtimeListener, but let's do better.

 

A player came out and called a whole team "dirty"

That doesn't happen too often, especially leading up to a game.

 

You have to be willfully ignorant to argue that Suh is not a dirty player. He's been fined and/or suspended seven times in four years for illegal hits or unnecessary roughness.

 

Suh replaced Cortland Finnegan as the player most hated by his peers for his dirty play and cheap shots.

 

An ignorant comment from a no-name player.

 

Sitton's a Pro Bowler and started in a Super Bowl.

 

So fucking what.
Suh is the best lineman in the game.
I'm done with this conversation until a few of you prove you can understand what you are reading.

 

Sounds good to me.

 

while Suh is indeed a dirty player, that the NFL thinks so is not great evidence. Goodell and his lackeys have their own agenda when it comes to dealing with players and fines and punishments. Objective analysis by the NFL merely coincides with their politics by happenstance.

 

That was really well played. You showed everybody.

 

I know I'm working extra hard to prove myself. :