1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Water, water everywhere. She had too much to drink.

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by spup1122, Jan 14, 2007.

  1. Columbo

    Columbo Active Member

    The unwashed masses have chunks of people with shoe-size IQs... and that is always understood.

    Companies definitely should be held to a higher standard.
  2. MacDaddy

    MacDaddy Active Member

    Because blaming others for your own idiocy is the American way.
  3. spnited

    spnited Active Member

    I wasn't talking about you.
  4. Columbo

    Columbo Active Member

    You know what they say about those big feet.
  5. Trey Beamon

    Trey Beamon Active Member

    So, who gets the Wii now?
  6. Football_Bat

    Football_Bat Well-Known Member

    Her kids probably should, but since she very likely doesn't have a will, it will wind up in probate court band the state will probably claim it.

    Arnold's got a brand new Wii.
  7. CradleRobber

    CradleRobber Active Member

    The lead story on the TV news said she did sign a waiver but didn't read through it. Supposedly the station did warn about death.
  8. Starman

    Starman Well-Known Member

    Any cross-ownership between the TV station and the radio station? Just have a leeetle hunch. ::)
  9. Columbo

    Columbo Active Member

    game, set and match, then.

    Rather Darwinian... Or Irwinian.... which one is it?
  10. three_bags_full

    three_bags_full Well-Known Member

    Darwinism at work.
  11. Football_Bat

    Football_Bat Well-Known Member

    Hey, look what made the lead story on Google News!

  12. alleyallen

    alleyallen Guest

    Gotta go with Spnited on this one. If there was a waiver and if the woman was warned of the possible danger, it's all on her. It's not like they suddenly surprised her with the "You can't take a leak" provision.

    And before anyone busts out with the "nice sympathy" card, let's remember it's possible to be realistic about blame while still having sympathy.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page